Genotypic variation in spatiotemporal distribution of canopy light interception in relation to yield formation in cotton

Table 3 Effect of cotton cultivar on cotton biomass accumulation and biomass partitioning in 2014 and 2015

Cultivar	Total biomass				Vegetative biomass				Reproductive biomass				Harvest index
	/(kg·hm⁻²)				/(kg·hm⁻²)				/(kg·hm⁻²)				/%
	2014		2015		2014		2015		2014		2015		2014		2015
J958	13 936	a§	13 489	a	7 800	a	7 333	A	6 137	b	6 155	cd	44.0	d	45.6	c
J228	13 429	ab	13 366	a	6 544	b	6 710	B	6 885	a	6 656	ab	51.3	b	49.8	b
C113	13 097	bc	12 606	bc	6 222	bc	6 265	C	6 875	a	6 341	b	52.5	ab	50.3	b
C60	12 457	c	12 416	bc	6 428	b	6 602	Bc	6 029	b	5 815	d	48.4	c	46.8	c
L28	12 867	c	12 952	ab	5 874	cd	6 159	Cd	6 993	a	6 793	a	54.3	a	52.4	a
C915	11 879	d	12 181	c	5 582	d	5 726	D	6 297	b	6 455	abc	53.0	ab	53.0	a
LSD	769		698		436		471		352		386		2.1		1.8

§ similar lower case letters indicate no significant difference among cotton varieties at the P = 0.05 level