Skip to main content

Table 3 The stable QTLs for agronomic traits identified by the composite intervalmapping (CIM) in multiple environments

From: QTL mapping for plant height and fruit branch number based on RIL population of upland cotton

Trait

QTL

Environment

Position /cM

Marker Interval

LOD

Additive

R2/%

Physical interval /Mb

Genes number

Reported previously

PH

qPH-c03–1

16ay

49.21

TM6645-TM6845

2.51

2.35

4.53

15.21–77.91

503

Said et al. 2013

13qz

50.71

2.65

1.49

4.98

qPH-c04–1

15ay

4.01

TM9846-TM9831

2.17

−1.67

3.97

60.53–60.81

26

16ay

4.01

2.26

−1.74

4.11

qPH-c04–3

13qz

32.91

TM9589-TM9576

3.4

2.13

6.84

52.11–54.03

46

13ay

36.31

2.79

1.75

5.43

qPH-c17–1

13ay

0.11

TM53503-TM53577

3.03

−1.99

5.82

2.47–3.73

88

Zhang et al. 2019a

14kel

4.61

2

−1.38

3.89

qPH-c19–1

15ay

17.21

DPL0022-CGR5590

3.74

1.85

7.17

3.87–5.71

218

Su et al. 2018

16ay

20.21

4.89

2.27

8.54

14kel

20.91

4.4

1.96

8.24

qPH-c25–1

14kel

6.81

TM58955-TM58998

3.09

1.44

5.77

1.27–1.70

44

16ay

7.51

3.79

2.02

7.11

FBN

qFBN-c14–1

14kel

56.61

TM52927-TM52567

2.43

0.25

6.23

56–60.31

156

14ay

61.61

3.16

0.73

8.49

qFBN-c18–2

13qz

34.71

TM80422-TM80570

1.7

0.18

3.29

7.79–15.74

281

14ay

38.41

2.17

0.41

4.32

15ay

38.41

2.65

0.2

5.25