Skip to main content

Table 3 The stable QTLs for agronomic traits identified by the composite intervalmapping (CIM) in multiple environments

From: QTL mapping for plant height and fruit branch number based on RIL population of upland cotton

TraitQTLEnvironmentPosition /cMMarker IntervalLODAdditiveR2/%Physical interval /MbGenes numberReported previously
PHqPH-c03–116ay49.21TM6645-TM68452.512.354.5315.21–77.91503Said et al. 2013
13qz50.712.651.494.98
qPH-c04–115ay4.01TM9846-TM98312.17−1.673.9760.53–60.8126
16ay4.012.26−1.744.11
qPH-c04–313qz32.91TM9589-TM95763.42.136.8452.11–54.0346
13ay36.312.791.755.43
qPH-c17–113ay0.11TM53503-TM535773.03−1.995.822.47–3.7388Zhang et al. 2019a
14kel4.612−1.383.89
qPH-c19–115ay17.21DPL0022-CGR55903.741.857.173.87–5.71218Su et al. 2018
16ay20.214.892.278.54
14kel20.914.41.968.24
qPH-c25–114kel6.81TM58955-TM589983.091.445.771.27–1.7044
16ay7.513.792.027.11
FBNqFBN-c14–114kel56.61TM52927-TM525672.430.256.2356–60.31156
14ay61.613.160.738.49
qFBN-c18–213qz34.71TM80422-TM805701.70.183.297.79–15.74281
14ay38.412.170.414.32
15ay38.412.650.25.25