Skip to main content

Table 4 Effect of N level on maturity In the pdf the Year is in 2 rows instead of 1 as in all other tables. Also first entry is skewed to the left in the pdf

From: Effect of nitrogen application level on cotton fibre quality

Year

Location

Country

N levels in kg·ha−1

Instrument

Remarks

References

1956–1957

Thorsby, Alabama

US

0, 67, 134 & 270

Unknown

Significant delay in maturity with increased N application levels

Scarsbrook et al. (1959)

1995–1998

Hama

Syria

0, 60, 120, 180 & 240

Unknown

No significant differences in maturity with increased N application levels

Janat and Somi (2002)

2001–2002

Unknown

Syria

50, 100, 150, 200 & 250

Unknown

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Janat (2008)

2001–2004

Stoneville, Mississippi

US

112 in four different application methods

Calculated

No significant differences in maturity and perimeter

Pettigew and Adamczyk (2006)

2005–2006

Multan, Punjab

Pakistan

0, 50, 100 & 150

HVI

No significant differences in maturity index or micronaire with increased N application levels

Afzal et al. (2018)

2007–2008

Multan, Punjab

Pakistan

0, 60, 110 & 160

HVI

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Ali (2011)

2009–2012

Stoneville, Mississippi

US

0, 56 & 112

AFIS

Significant reduction in maturity and fineness with increased N application levels

Pettigew and Zeng (2014)

2012–2013

Chapadão do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul

Brazil

0, 40, 80, 120 & 160

HVI

Significant decrease in maturity with increased N application levels

Leal et al. (2020)

2011–2012

Yellow River Delta, Hebei

China

0, 120, 240 & 480

Taicang Electron Apparatus

Significant increase in maturity up to 240 kg·ha−1 with a significant decrease above 240 kg·ha−1

Chen et al. (2019)

2012–2013

Primavera do Leste, Mato Grosso

Brazil

70, 140 & 210

HVI

Significant reduction in maturity with increased N application levels

Echer et al. (2020)