QTL mapping of agronomic and economic traits for four F2 populations of upland cotton

LI, Hongge; PAN, Zhaoe; HE, Shoupu; JIA, Yinhua; GENG, Xiaoli; CHEN, Baojun; WANG, Liru; PANG, Baoyin; DU, Xiongming

doi:10.1186/s42397-020-00076-y

Journal of Cotton Research

Table 3 Summary of QTLs identified in four populations for 8 traits

From: QTL mapping of agronomic and economic traits for four F₂ populations of upland cotton

Traits	QTLs	Population	LG	Position /cM	LOD	R² /%	Add.	Dom.	Dom.De
PH	qPH1	4Su	LG1	0.01	3.93	1.55	−5.05	−4.11	0.81
	qPH2–1	4Su	LG2	7.61	4.37	2.66	0.34	26.39	78.28
	qPH2–2	4Su	LG2	13.61	4.06	4.02	0.66	−26.83	40.74
	qPH4	4Su	LG4	95.31	4.18	2.55	−7.01	−4.82	0.69
	qPH9–1	4Su	LG9	105.81	2.67	0.58	−4.12	−6.09	1.48
	qPH9–2	4Su	LG9	118.61	2.52	1.98	−6.12	−7.57	1.24
	qPH6	Sg4	LG6	172.41	3.10	0.11	2.30	8.27	3.59
BW	qBW4	4 J	LG4	13.31	4.08	5.66	−0.34	−0.07	0.19
	qBW2	SgJ	LG2	33.21	4.46	1.98	−0.30	−0.22	0.74
	qBW1–1	Sg4	LG1	87.01	3.98	1.17	−0.14	−0.75	5.25
	qBW1–2	Sg4	LG1	227.51	9.01	9.31	0.54	0.35	0.64
	qBW6–1	Sg4	LG6	17.51	2.66	4.26	0.24	0.02	0.08
	qBW6–2	Sg4	LG6	94.51	3.32	2.74	0.30	0.46	1.54
	qBW6–3	Sg4	LG6	131.81	3.49	2.21	0.25	0.35	1.41
	qBW9	Sg4	LG9	7.71	2.87	2.44	−0.22	− 0.08	0.39
LP	qLP9	4Su	LG9	95.31	3.40	1.68	−0.79	−0.85	1.07
	qLP10	4Su	LG10	2.71	5.21	1.75	−0.93	−0.74	0.80
	qLP5_4J	4 J	LG5	31.01	3.15	7.49	0.52	−0.85	1.63
	qLP7_4J	4 J	LG7	22.01	5.03	18.11	−1.01	1.27	1.25
	qLP2	SgJ	LG2	1.01	11.31	11.74	−9.67	9.47	0.98
	qLP5_SgJ	SgJ	LG5	26.41	3.15	5.82	−0.95	− 0.01	0.01
	qLP6	Sg4	LG6	181.41	5.07	5.02	0.81	0.97	1.19
	qLP7_Sg4	Sg4	LG7	63.51	2.83	7.63	0.53	−1.47	2.77
FL	qFL2–1	4Su	LG2	4.61	2.90	7.70	0.08	−1.57	19.30
	qFL2–2	4Su	LG2	20.11	2.94	4.52	−0.79	0.03	0.04
	qFL7_4Su	4Su	LG7	6.01	2.82	6.01	0.41	−0.26	0.65
	qFL9–1	4Su	LG9	96.31	7.90	3.25	0.72	0.86	1.20
	qFL9–2	4Su	LG9	102.81	8.05	5.41	0.77	0.59	0.77
	qFL9–3	4Su	LG9	120.61	4.48	1.62	0.54	1.08	2.01
	qFL5	4 J	LG5	64.31	3.32	4.22	0.11	−2.18	19.44
	qFL6	SgJ	LG6	7.01	2.60	2.70	0.42	0.21	0.51
	qFL7_SgJ	SgJ	LG7	6.01	2.88	6.76	0.36	−0.27	0.73
	qFL15–1	SgJ	LG15	26.61	2.61	0.35	0.15	0.49	3.19
	qFL15–2	SgJ	LG15	68.61	2.74	3.43	0.81	0.12	0.15
FS	qFS1	4Su	LG1	3.01	2.51	2.95	0.75	0.14	0.19
	qFS7	4Su	LG7	10.61	2.80	3.13	0.77	0.12	0.15
	qFS9–1	4Su	LG9	96.31	8.72	7.15	1.52	1.16	0.76
	qFS9–2	4Su	LG9	101.81	7.75	6.09	1.35	0.73	0.54
	qFS2	Sg4	LG2	15.91	3.71	15.10	−0.72	0.73	1.02
FU	qFU9–1	4Su	LG9	41.71	2.92	1.24	0.40	0.38	0.95
FU	qFU9–2	4Su	LG9	72.21	2.52	0.10	−1.11	2.15	1.93
FE	qFE9	4Su	LG9	96.31	4.08	0.16	0.06	0.12	2.07
	qFE8	SgJ	LG8	24.21	3.73	5.62	−0.07	0.00	0.04
	qFE1	Sg4	LG1	245.01	3.76	1.46	0.05	0.06	1.33
	qFE6	Sg4	LG6	152.81	4.29	1.05	0.04	0.13	3.57
MIC	qMIC9–1	4Su	LG9	41.71	2.91	1.63	0.00	0.32	92.03
	qMIC9–2	4Su	LG9	100.81	2.51	6.29	−0.20	0.13	0.66
	qMIC1–1	Sg4	LG1	52.31	3.58	0.47	−0.02	−0.74	30.64
	qMIC1–2	Sg4	LG1	88.01	5.54	0.15	−0.02	−0.95	47.68
	qMIC2	Sg4	LG2	68.31	4.10	59.24	0.10	−0.92	9.41

Note: Add. Additive effect; Dom Dominant effect; Dom. De Dominance degree

Back to article page

ISSN: 2523-3254

Contact us

Submission enquiries: pia.sustal@springernature.com
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com