Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of N level on micronaire

From: Effect of nitrogen application level on cotton fibre quality

Year

Location

Country

N levels in kg·ha−1

Instrument

Remarks

References

1944–1946

Rocky Mount, North Carolina

US

11,39 & 67

Arealometer

No significant differences in fineness with increased N application levels

Nelson (1949)

1951–1960

Brawley, California

US

0, 107, 214 & 321

Micronaire

Increase in micronaire with increased N application levels

Bennett et al. (1967)

1956–1962

Thorsby, Alabama

US

0, 107, 214 & 321

Micronaire

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Bennett et al. (1967)

1959–1960

Brawley, California

US

0, 107, 214 & 321

Micronaire

No clear trend with increased N application levels

MacKenzie and Schaik (1963)

1961–1963

Magnum, Oklahoma

US

0, 44, 67, 90 & 112

Micronaire

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Murray et al. (1965)

1961–1963

Altus, Oklahoma

US

0, 44, 67, 90 & 112

Micronaire

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Murray et al. (1965)

1961–1963

Unknown

US

0, 28, 54, 80, 120, 134, 161 & 187

Arealometer

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Perkins and Douglas (1965)

1963–1965

Yuma, Arizona

US

84 & 224

Unknown

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Jackson and Tilt (1968)

1965–1980

Eight locations

Greece

0, 60, 50, 100, 120, 150,180 & 200

Micronaire

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Setatou and Simonis (1994, 1995)

1967

Fresno County, California

US

56, 105, 224, 343 & 392

Micronaire

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Grimes et al. (1969a; b)

1967

Kern County, California

US

0, 41, 140, 239 & 280

Micronaire

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Grimes et al. (1969a; b)

1972–1973

Kimberley, Western Australia

Australia

34, 112, 168 & 225

Micronaire

Significant reduction in micronaire with increased N application levels

Hearn (1976)

1973–1974

Unknownb

US

0, 45 & 90

Micronaire

Although not significant a clear reduction in micronaire with increased N application levels

Koli and Morrill (1976a)

1972–1983

Altus, Oklahoma

US

0, 44, 90& 135

Micronaire

In less than ideal conditions (e.g., short seasons, excessive rain in the fall, low temperatures), high N application levels tended to delay maturity, resulting in more immature fibres and reduced micronaire. While in the opposite (e.g., under the opposite conditions from those listed above), fibres tend to be more mature and thus increased micronaire. However, as these micronaire results were within the base grade (3.5 to 4.9) and hence resulted in no discounts, the differences were of little practical importance

Boman et al. (1997) and Fritschi et al. (2003)

1974

Narrabri, New South Wales

Australia

0, 40, 80 &160

Arealometer

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Constable and Hearn (1981)

1975–1978

Narrabri, New South Wales

Australia

0, 50, 100 & 150

Arealometer

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Constable and Hearn (1981)

1984–1986

Altus, Oklahoma

US

0, 56, 112 & 224

HVI

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Boman and Westerman (1994)

1989–2004

Altus, Oklahoma

US

0, 45, 90, 135, 180 & 225

HVI

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Girma et al. (2007)

1991–1992

Stoneville, Mississippi

US

112 & 150

Arealometer

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Pettigew et al. (1996)

1991–1992

Lakhasti

India

0, 40, 80 & 120

Unknown

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Chand et al. (1997)

1991–1992

Uvalde, Texasa

US

0, 67, 135, 202 & 269

HVI

Small but significant decrease in micronaire with increased N application levels

Tewolde and Fernandez (2003)

1992–1996

Mississippi Delta

US

101, 135, 168 & 202

HVI

Significant reduction in micronaire with increased N application levels

Ebelhar et al. (1996)

1995–1998

Hama

Syria

0, 60, 120, 180 & 240

 Unknown

Small decrease in micronaire with increased N application levels

Janat and Somi (2002)

1996–1998

Florence, South Carolina

US

0, 78 & 112

HVI

Small but significant increase in micronaire with increased N application levels

Bauer and Roof (2004)

1997–2000

Winnsboro, Louisianab

US

90, 112, 134 & 157

HVI

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Boquet (2005)

1998–2000

San Joaquin Valley, California

US

56, 112, 168 & 224

HVI

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Fritschi et al. (2003)

1999

Thrall, Texasb

US

0, 56, 112 & 224

HVI

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

McFarland et al. (1999)

1999–2000

Mississippi

US

Small scale trial with control and 20% at first flower & 0% at first flower

Micronaire

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Read et al. (2006)

1999–2000

Fresno, Californiaa

US

56, 112, 168 & 224

HVI

Small but significant decrease in micronaire, in all likelihood due to delay in maturity, with increased N application levels

Fritschi et al. (2003)

1999–2000

Gizaa

Egypt

95 & 143

Micronaire

Small but significant increase in micronaire with increased N application levels

Sawan et al. (2006)

2001–2002

Unknown

Syria

50, 100, 150, 200 & 250

Unknown

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Janat (2008)

2003–2004

Adana

Turkey

0, 80 & 160

HVI

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Gormus (2005)

2001–2004

Stoneville, Mississippi

US

112 in four different application methods

Arealometer

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Pettigew and Adamczyk (2006)

2005

Nanjing, Jiangsu

China

0, 240 & 480

HVI

Small but significant reduction in micronaire with increased N application levels

Zhao et al. (2012)

2005

Xuzhou, Jiangsu

China

0, 240 & 480

HVI

Small but significant reduction in micronaire with increased N application levels

Zhao et al. (2012)

2005–2006

Multan, Punjab

Pakistan

0, 50, 100 & 150

HVI

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Afzal et al. (2018)

2006

Faisalabad, Punjab

Pakistan

0, 60, 120 & 180

HVI

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Saleem et al. (2010)

2007

Anyang, Henan

China

0, 240 & 480

HVI

Small but significant reduction in micronaire with increased N application levels

Zhao et al. (2012)

2009–2012

Stoneville, Mississippi

US

0, 56 & 112

HVI

Significant reduction in micronaire with increased N application levels

Pettigew (2012) and Pettigew and Zeng (2014)

2008–2010

Varamin, Tehran

Iran

200, 300, 350 & 400

HVI

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Madani and Oveysi (2015)

2008–2010

Gorgan, Golestan

Iran

200, 300, 350 & 400

HVI

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Madani and Oveysi (2015)

2009–2010

Varamin, Tehran

Iran

0, 100, 200 & 300

HVI

Slight increase in micronaire with increased N application levels

Rashidi and Gholami (2011), Hossein et al. (2014), and Seilsepour and Rashidi (2011)

2009

Mississippi State University

US

0 & 100

HVI

Slight but significant decrease in micronaire due to reduced maturity with increased N application levels

Lokhande and Reddy (2015)

2010–2011

Adana

Turkey

0, 60, 120, 180 & 240

HVI

Significant increase in micronaire up to 180 kg·ha−1 with a significant decrease above 180 kg·ha−1

Gormus et al. (2016a)

2012–2013

Adana

Turkey

0, 60, 120, 180 & 240

HVI

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Gormus and El Sagagh (2016b)

2011

Torreón, Coahuila

Mexico

0, 50, 100, & 150

Unknown

No significant differences in micronaire with increased N application levels

Hernandes-Cruz et al. (2015)

2011–2012

Yellow River Delta, Hebei

China

0, 120, 240 & 480

HVI

Significant increase in micronaire up to 240 kg·ha−1 with a significant decrease above 240 kg·ha−1

Chen et al. (2019)

2012–2013

Primavera do Leste, Mato Grosso

Brazil

70, 140 & 210

HVI

Significant reduction in micronaire with increased N application levels

Echer et al. (2020)

2012–2013

Chapadão do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul

Brazil

0, 40, 80, 120 & 160

HVI

Significant decrease in micronaire with increased N application levels

Leal et al. (2020)

2013

Stoneville, Mississippi

US

0, 39, 67, 101, 135 & 168

HVI

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Sui et al. (2017)

2014

Stoneville, Mississippi

US

0, 56, 112, 168 & 224

HVI

Significant reduction in micronaire with increased N application levels

Sui et al. (2017)

2013–2014

New Delhi

India

100, 125, 150 & 175

Micronaire

No clear trend with increased N application levels

Verna et al. (2017)

2016–2018

Suffolk, Virginia

US

0, 45, 90, 135 & 180

HVI

Small decrease in micronaire with increased N application levels

McClanahan et al. (2020)

2016–2017

Lewiston-Woodside, North Carolina

US

0, 45, 90, 135 & 180

HVI

Small decrease in micronaire with increased N application levels

McClanahan et al. (2020)

2018

Yale, Virginia

US

0, 45, 90, 135 & 180

HVI

No clear trend with increased N application levels

McClanahan et al. (2020)

Unknown

Gizaa

Egypt

107 & 161

Micronaire

Slight increase in micronaire with increased N application levels

Sawan et al. (1997)

  1. aPima
  2. bUltra narrow row