Skip to main content

Table 1 Shoot hydraulic conductance (Kshoot) (kg H2O s−1 MPa−1), standard deviation (SD), and R2 response of cotton cultivars in Experiment 1: (38 °C, vapor pressure deficit (VPD) > 3 kPa) and Experiment 2: (32 °C, VPD = 1–1.5 kPa) in controlled environments

From: Cotton stomatal closure under varying temperature and vapor pressure deficit, correlation with the hydraulic conductance trait

Cultivar

Kshoot

SD (× 10−11)

R2

Experiment 1

ST 6182 GLT

6.80 × 10−9 a

6.3

0.99

PHY 330 W3FE

6.23 × 10−9 ab

13.0

0.99

PHY 490 W3FE

5.62 × 10−9 ab

7.4

0.99

PHY 340 W3FE

5.43 × 10−9 ab

12.4

0.99

ST 4949 GLT

3.97 × 10−9 ab

2.1

0.99

Arkot 9704

3.55 × 10−9 b

1.5

0.99

Arkot 0705

3.37 × 10−9 b

7.7

0.99

DP 393

3.18 × 10−9 b

1.5

0.99

UA 107

3.16 × 10−9 b

1.6

0.99

DP 1612 B2XF

3.10 × 10−9 b

3.0

0.99

Experiment 2

PHY 490 W3FE

1.97 × 10−9 ns

16.4

0.97

DP 393

1.87 × 10−9

0.8

0.9

ST 6182 GLT

1.83 × 10−9

12.6

0.98

Arkot 0705

1.58 × 10−9

0.4

0.99

PHY 340 W3FE

1.53 × 10−9

4.6

0.99

Arkot 9704

1.53 × 10−9

3.6

0.99

UA 107

1.37 × 10−9

6.8

0.99

DP 1612 B2XF

1.28 × 10−9

2.0

0.99

PHY 330 W3FE

1.25 × 10−9

0.9

0.99

ST 4949 GLT

1.23 × 10−9

1.7

0.99

  1. Cultivars followed by the same letter within each experiment are not significantly different based on the 95% confidence interval
  2. ns not significant (P < 0.05)