Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of Cotton Research

Fig. 2

From: Barley chitinase genes expression revamp resistance against whitefly (Bemisia Tabaci) in transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Fig. 2

(A1) Comparison of average yield per plant in transgenic line harboring ChI gene and non-transgenic control line; (A2) Average yield per plant of transgenic line harboring ChII gene and non-transgenic control line. Each bar represents an average of biological triplicate from control and transgenic lines. One way ANOVA anlysis was performed for statistical analysis. A steric indicate significance difference (****P< 0.0001). (B1) Comparison of plant height in transgenic line harboring ChI gene and non-transgenic control line; (B2) Comparison of plant height in transgenic line harboring ChII gene and non-transgenic control line each bar represents average of biological triplicate from control and transgenic lines. One way ANOVA anlysis was performed for statistical analysis. A steric indicate significance difference (**P< 0.0016; * P< 0.0086). (C1) Comparison of the number of bolls per plant in transgenic line harboring ChI gene and non-transgenic control line; (C2) Comparison of the number of bolls per plant of transgenic line harboring ChII gene and non-transgenic control line. Each bar represents an average of biological triplicate from the control and transgenic lines. One way ANOVA anlysis was performed for statistical analysis. A steric indicate significance difference (***P< 0.0002; ** P < 0.0021). (D1) Comparison of lint (GOT) percentage of transgenic line harboring ChI gene and non-transgenic control line. (D2) Comparison of transgenic line harboring ChII gene and non-transgenic control line showing lint (GOT) percentage. Each bar is representative of the mean value of three plants’ yield. One way ANOVA analysis was performed for statistical analysis

Back to article page