Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | Journal of Cotton Research

Fig. 3

From: Barley chitinase genes expression revamp resistance against whitefly (Bemisia Tabaci) in transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Fig. 3

(A1) Comparative analysis of Photosynthetic rate of transgenic line harboring ChI gene and non-transgenic control line; (A2) Comparetive analysis of photosynthetic rate of transgenic line harboring ChII gene and non-transgenic control line. Each bar represents an average of biological triplicate from control and transgenic lines. One way ANOVA anlysis was performed for statistical analysis. A steric indicate significance difference (**P< 0.0044). (B1) Comparative analysis of respiration rate of transgenic line harboring ChI gene and non-transgenic control line; (B2) Comparative analysis of Transgenic line harboring ChII gene and non-transgenic control line showing respiration rate. Each bar is representative of the mean value of three plants. One way ANOVA analysis was performed for statistical analysis. (C1) Analysis of gaseous exchange rate in transgenic line harboring ChI gene in contrast to non-transgenic control line; (C2) Analysis gaseous exchange rate in transgenic line harboring ChII gene in contrast to non-transgenic control line. Each bar represents an average of biological triplicate from control and transgenic lines. Oneway ANOVA anlysis was performed for statistical analysis. A steric indicate significance difference (*P< 0.0117)

Back to article page