Skip to main content

Table 3 Parameters of growth equation for aboveground dry matter in cotton under different row configuration, plant density, and topping treatments in 2020 and 2021

From: Yields, growth and water use under chemical topping in relations to row configuration and plant density in drip-irrigated cotton

Year

Row configuration

Topping

Plant density

cm

rm

tb

NRMSE

R 2

plants·m-2

g·m-2·d-1

d-1

d

(%)

 

2020

Equal row spacing

Manual topping

18

21.3±1.63 a

0.06±0.00 a

62.6±0.22 b

13.7

0.99

10

13.7±1.16 b

0.04±0.00 b

65.8±0.76 a

10.7

0.97

Chemical topping

18

22.1±1.33 a

0.05±0.01 a

63.5±0.58 a

5.90

0.97

10

15.8±1.14 b

0.05±0.01 a

63.7±1.02 a

12.4

0.98

Narrow-wide row spacing

Manual topping

25

25.4±3.35 a

0.05±0.01 a

65.1±2.17 a

12.4

0.97

15

19.3±2.73 a

0.06±0.01 a

63.7±1.39 a

10.0

0.98

Chemical topping

25

21.6±1.37 a

0.04±0.00 a

66.3±0.84 a

15.2

0.96

15

18.9±1.67 a

0.05±0.01 a

64.2±1.23 a

21.0

0.96

2021

Equal row spacing

Manual topping

18

28.2±1.25 a

0.06±0.00 a

60.6±0.17 a

10.5

0.98

10

20.4±1.17 b

0.08±0.01 a

60.2±0.54 a

9.14

0.97

Chemical topping

18

31.0±1.57 a

0.06±0.00 b

60.6±0.21 a

12.6

0.98

10

19.8±0.56 b

0.08±0.00 a

60.1±0.12 a

16.0

0.95

Narrow-wide row spacing

Manual topping

25

29.0±0.84 a

0.06±0.01 a

60.7±0.31 a

9.88

0.98

15

20.0±0.85 b

0.07±0.01 a

60.8±0.57 a

11.1

0.98

Chemical topping

25

29.4±1.72 a

0.08±0.01 a

60.9±0.82 a

5.43

0.98

15

21.1±1.90 b

0.08±0.01 a

60.1±0.27 a

17.2

0.96

  1. Lowe cases indicate no significant difference between plant density within same row configurations and topping treatments