Skip to main content

Advertisement

Designations for individual genomes and chromosomes in Gossypium

Article metrics

  • 1921 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

Gossypium, as the one of the biggest genera, the most diversity, and the highest economic value in field crops, is assuming an increasingly important role in studies on plant taxonomy, polyploidization, phylogeny, cytogenetics, and genomics. Here we update and provide a brief summary of the emerging picture of species relationships and diversification, and a set of the designations for individual genomes and chromosomes in Gossypium. This cytogenetic and genomic nomenclature will facilitate comparative studies worldwide, which range from basic taxonomic exploration to breeding and germplasm introgression.

Because of its diversity and economic significance, the cotton genus (Gossypium) has been subjected to decades of taxonomic, cytogenetic, and phylogenetic analyses. Accordingly, a reasonably well-documented phylogenetic and taxonomic understanding has developed, as recently summarized (Wendel and Grover 2015). Work published since that time also supports the emerging picture of species relationships and diversification (Grover et al. 2015a, 2015b; Chen et al. 2016; Gallagher et al. 2017). Our purpose here is to provide a brief summary of this understanding, and to introduce the chromosomal context for the genome designations that are widely used by cotton researchers worldwide.

As shown in Table 1, the genus is divided into 8 diploid genome groups (A through G, and K), as well as one allopolyploid clade (AD genome) formed from ancient merger and chromosome doubling from A and D genome ancestors. These genome groups were initially defined based on comparative chromosome sizes and chromosome behavior in interspecific hybrids (Beasley 1942; Stephens 1947; Phillips 1966; Fryxell 1992; Endrizzi et al. 1985). Subsequent phylogenetic work (reviewed in Wendel and Grover 2015) has confirmed that each of these genome groups is monophyletic; that is, they have a single origin, with each genome group comprising a natural set of more or less closely related species. Genome groups vary widely in species diversity, from consisting of only a single species (F genome) to larger genome groups containing more than a dozen species each (D, K). The important allopolyploid clade, which includes G. hirsutum and G. barbadense, contains 7 species, including two described only in the last 10 years (G. ekmanianum, G. stephensii) (Krapovickas and Seijo 2008; Gallagher et al. 2017).

Table 1 Taxonomic, cytogenetic and geographic diversity of species of Gossypium. Included are descriptions are each genome group and the collective geographic distribution of the included species. Genomic placements and taxonomic status of species enclosed by parentheses remain to be established as they are poorly known

Many Gossypium species are taxonomically well-understood, whereas others are poorly known and not well-established as bona fide species; these are indicated with parentheses in Table 1. Most notable in this respect are species or putative species from the horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula; several of these species are poorly represented in herbarium collections and no living material has been available for study (last five in Table 2). Remarkably, new species remain to be discovered and or taxonomically described, as evidenced by the recent publication of G. anapoides (Stewart et al. 2014) and G. stephensii (Gallagher et al. 2017). Also notable is the relatively poorly understood diversity in the Mexican arborescent clade, in which additional species likely remain to be described (Wendel and Grover 2015; Feng et al. 2011). More species might be discovered in Australia and in Southern America with new exploitation.

Table 2 Nomenclature of individual genomes and chromosomes for each species in Gossypium, with Chinese translation of species names

This taxonomic framework provides a justification for a nomenclature for individual genomes and chromosomes in each species in Gossypium. A stable and accepted nomenclature will facilitate comparisons among the many kinds of studies that might be conducted in Gossypium, which range from basic taxonomic exploration to breeding and germplasm introgression. As shown in Table 2, designations of genomes and chromosomes in each species, subspecies and variety in Gossypium are suggested, including for G. herbaceum subs. africanum with its genome as A1-a, which might be useful for ongoing genomic studies, and one Mexican arborescent species with a genome designated as D12, as this species may soon be described as a new D genome species. The last five species in Table 2 have not been assigned genome designations because they are poorly represented in herbarium collections and no living material has been available for study.

A comparative nomenclature of individual chromosomes in Gossypium is facilitated by the many early studies in the later decades of the previous century, when cotton karyotype studies were frequently conducted (Edwards 1977, 1979a, 1979b; Wang et al. 1994; Endrizzi et al. 1985; Wendel and Grover 2015). These earlier investigations provided an important foundation for the transition into the molecular biology era. By using cultivars or wild species in Gossypium, there were increasingly frequent reports on genetic mapping related to linkage groups (Brubaker et al. 1999; Rong et al. 2004; Khan et al. 2016), on identifications of individual chromosomes (Wang et al. 2007, 2008; Gan et al. 2011, 2012, 2013; Shan et al. 2016), and even on microdissection and microcloning of individual chromosomes (Peng et al. 2012). De novo sequence-based genomic studies provided detailed information on single or pseudo-chromosomes (Wang et al. 2012; Paterson et al. 2012; Li et al. 2014, 2015; Zhang et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2015; Yuan et al. 2015).

These and many other studies collectively indicate that a clear nomenclature of individual chromosomes in Gossypium will be useful to facilitate communication and to provide consistency in chromosome designations. Here we suggest such designations (Table 2) for all clades in Gossypium, with the exception of the last five taxa that are too poorly understood taxonomically and cytogenetically to be included. For the seven allotetraploid species, the first letters of their specific names are used instead of their corresponding genome designations. Ah and Dh stand for corresponding chromosome sets of A-sub and D-sub genome, respectively, for G. hirsutum, as well as Ab and Db for G. barbadense, Att and Dtt for G. tomentosum, Am and Dm for G. mustelinum, Ad and Dd for G. darwinii, Ae and De for G. ekmanianum, and As and Ds for G. stephensii. At and Dt are more broadly used terms that designate chromosomes of A-sub and D-sub genomes in all allotetraploid cottons, respectively, from which the Att and Dtt for G. tomentosum are distinguished. Generally, in diploid species, the designations for individual chromosomes correspond to the individual genomes. There is another exception for G. armourianum and G. harknessii because of the historical use of the genome designation D2 for both of these species; accordingly, ‘a’ and ‘h’, the first letters of their specific epithets, are used to clarify this confusion, so that the individual chromosomes of the two species are designated D2a1 - D2a13 and D2h1 ~ D2h13, respectively. The other break with tradition is the simplifying omission of dashes in individual chromosome designations for G. herbaceum subs. africanum, G. sturtianum var nandewarense, G. armourianum, G. harknessii, G. davidsonii and G. klotzschianum.

References

  1. Beasley JO. Meiotic chromosome behavior in species, species hybrids, haploids, and induced polyploids of Gossypium. Genetics. 1942;27(1):25–54.

  2. Brubaker CL, Paterson AH, Wendel JF. Comparative genetic mapping of allotetraploid cotton and its diploid progenitors. Genome. 1999;42:184–203. https://doi.org/10.1139/g98-118.

  3. Chen ZW, Feng K, Grover CE, et al. Chloroplast DNA structural variation, phylogeny, and age of divergence among diploid cotton species. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157183.

  4. Edwards GA. The karyotype of Gossypium herbaceum L. Caryologia. 1977;30:369–74.

  5. Edwards GA. Genomes of the Australia wild species of cotton I. Gossypium sturtianum, the standard for the C genome. Can J Genet Cytol. 1979a;21:363–6.

  6. Edwards GA. Genomes of the Australia wild species of cotton II. The designation of a new G genome, for Gossypium bickii. Can J Genet Cytol. 1979b;21:367–72.

  7. Endrizzi JE, Turcotte EL, Kohel RJ. Genetics, cytology, and evolution of Gossypium. Adv Genet. 1985;23:271–375.

  8. Feng CD, Ulloa M, Perez-M C, Stewart JM. Distribution and molecular diversity of arborescent Gossypium species. Botany. 2011;89:615–24. https://doi.org/10.1139/b11-042.

  9. Fryxell PA. A revised taxonomic interpretation of Gossypium. Rheedea. 1992;2:108–65.

  10. Gallagher JP, Grover CE, Rex K, et al. A new species of cotton from Wake Atoll, Gossypium stephensii (Malvaceae). Syst Bot. 2017;42(1):115–23. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364417X694593.

  11. Gan YM, Chen D, Liu F, et al. Individual chromosome assignment and chromosomal collinearity in Gossypium thurberi, G. trilobum and D subgenome of G. barbadense revealed by BAC-FISH. Genes Genet Syst. 2011;86:165–74.

  12. Gan YM, Liu F, Chen D, et al. Chromosomal locations of 45S and 5S rDNA in Gossypium genus and its phylogenetic implications revealed by FISH. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e68207. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068207.

  13. Gan YM, Liu F, Peng RH, et al. Individual chromosome identification, chromosomal collinearity and genetic-physical integrated map in Gossypium darwinii and four D genome cotton species revealed by BAC-FISH. Genes Genet Syst. 2012;87:233–41.

  14. Grover CE, Gallagher JP, Jareczek JJ, et al. Re-evaluating the phylogeny of allopolyploid Gossypium L. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015b;92:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.05.023.

  15. Grover CE, Zhu X, Grupp KK, et al. Molecular confirmation of species status for the allopolyploid cotton species, Gossypium ekmanianum. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2015a;62:103–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-014-0138-x.

  16. Khan MKR, Chen HD, Zhou ZL, et al. Genome wide SSR high density genetic map construction from an interspecific cross of Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium tomentosum. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:436. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00436.

  17. Krapovickas A, Seijo G. Gossypium ekmanianum (Malvaceae), algodon silvestre de la Republica Dominicana. Bonplandia. 2008;17:55–63.

  18. Li FG, Fan GY, Lu CR, et al. Genome sequence of cultivated upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):524–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3208.

  19. Li FG, Fan GY, Wang KB, et al. Genome sequence of the cultivated cotton Gossypium arboreum. Nat Genet. 2014;46:567–74. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2987.

  20. Liu X, Zhao B, Zheng HJ, et al. Gossypium barbadense genome sequence provides insight into the evolution of extra-long staple fiber and specialized metabolites. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14139. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14139.

  21. Paterson AH, Wendel JF, Gundlach H, et al. Repeated polyploidization of Gossypium genomes and the evolution of spinnable cotton fibres. Nature. 2012;492:423–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11798.

  22. Peng RH, Liu F, Hu X, et al. Microdissection and microcloning of chromosome 5 in Gossypium arboreum. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2012;30:1218–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-012-0438-2.

  23. Phillips LL. The cytology and phylogenetics of the diploid species of Gossypium. Am J Bot. 1966;53(4):328–35.

  24. Rong JK, Abbey C, Bowers JE, et al. A 3347-locus genetic recombination map of sequence-tagged sites reveals features of genome organization, transmission and evolution of cotton (Gossypium). Genetics. 2004;166:389–417.

  25. Shan WB, Jiang YQ, Han JL, et al. Comprehensive cytological characterization of the Gossypium hirsutum genome based on the development of a set of chromosome cytological markers. Crop J. 2016;4(4):256–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2016.04.001.

  26. Stephens SG. Cytogenetics of Gossypium and the problem of the origin of new world cottons//Advances in genetics, vol. 1. Cambridge: Academic Press. 1947. p. 431–42.

  27. Stewart JM, Craven LA, Brubaker C, Wendel JF. Gossypium anapoides (Malvaceae), a new species from Western Australia. Novon. 2014;23:447–51. https://doi.org/10.3417/2007140.

  28. Wang K, Guan B, Guo WZ, et al. Completely distinguishing individual A-genome chromosomes and their karyotyping analysis by multiple bacterial artificial chromosome–fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genetics. 2008;178(2):1117–22. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.083576.

  29. Wang K, Guo WZ, Zhang TZ. Development of one set of chromosome-specific microsatellite-containing BACs and their physical mapping in Gossypium hirsutum L. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;115(5):675–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/%20s00122-007-0598-x.

  30. Wang KB. Identification of Karyotype of Gossypium Bickii Proch// Proceedings of World Cotton Research Conference-1, Brisbane, Australia, February 13-17, 1994. Washington, DC: International Cotton Advisory Committee. 1994. p. 299–302.

  31. Wang KB, Wang ZW, Li FG, et al. The draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii. Nat Genet. 2012;44(10):1098–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2371.

  32. Wendel JF, Grover CE. Taxonomy and evolution of the cotton genus//Fang D, Percy R, editors. Cotton, Agronomy Monograph 24. Madison: ASA-CSSA-SSSA. 2015. p. 25–44.

  33. Yuan DJ, Tang ZH, Wang MJ, et al. The genome sequence of Sea-Island cotton (Gossypium barbadense) provides insights into the allopolyploidization and development of superior spinnable fibres. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17662. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17662.

  34. Zhang TZ, Hu Y, Jiang WK, et al. Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):531–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3207.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. James McD Stewart (deceased, serving as a professor in Arkansas State University in 2007) for his some suggestions to the designations for individual genomes in Gossypium.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31530053).

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Author information

Wang KB conceived of the subject, and participated in its design and coordination and jointly to draft the manuscript; Wendel JF participated in the design and jointly to draft the manuscript; Hua JP participated in the design and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Kunbo WANG.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Nomenclature
  • Individual genome
  • Individual chromosome
  • Gossypium