Skip to main content

Knockdown of 60S ribosomal protein L14-2 reveals their potential regulatory roles to enhance drought and salt tolerance in cotton

Abstract

Background

Cotton is a valuable economic crop and the main significant source of natural fiber for textile industries globally. The effects of drought and salt stress pose a challenge to strong fiber and large-scale production due to the ever-changing climatic conditions. However, plants have evolved a number of survival strategies, among them is the induction of various stress-responsive genes such as the ribosomal protein large (RPL) gene. The RPL gene families encode critical proteins, which alleviate the effects of drought and salt stress in plants. In this study, comprehensive and functional analysis of the cotton RPL genes was carried out under drought and salt stresses.

Results

Based on the genome-wide evaluation, 26, 8, and 5 proteins containing the RPL14B domain were identified in Gossypium hirsutum, G. raimondii, and G. arboreum, respectively. Furthermore, through bioinformatics analysis, key cis-regulatory elements related to RPL14B genes were discovered. The Myb binding sites (MBS), abscisic acid-responsive element (ABRE), CAAT-box, TATA box, TGACG-motif, and CGTCA-motif responsive to methyl jasmonate, as well as the TCA-motif responsive to salicylic acid, were identified. Expression analysis revealed a key gene, Gh_D01G0234 (RPL14B), with significantly higher induction levels was further evaluated through a reverse genetic approach. The knockdown of Gh_D01G0234 (RPL14B) significantly affected the performance of cotton seedlings under drought/salt stress conditions, as evidenced by a substantial reduction in various morphological and physiological traits. Moreover, the level of the antioxidant enzyme was significantly reduced in VIGS-plants, while oxidant enzyme levels increased significantly, as demonstrated by the higher malondialdehyde concentration level.

Conclusion

The results revealed the potential role of the RPL14B gene in promoting the induction of antioxidant enzymes, which are key in oxidizing the various oxidants. The key pathways need to be investigated and even as we exploit these genes in the developing of more stress-resilient cotton germplasms.

Highlights

  • Cotton is the source of natural fiber. However, drought and salt stress exacerbated by climate change, pose a severe threat to strong fiber and large quantity production.

  • The RPL14B gene was previously identified as a candidate gene for drought stress tolerance in the QTL map.

  • Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) revealed that the Gh_D01G0234 (RPL14B) knockdown significantly impacted cotton seedling production under drought and salt stress conditions.

Background

Cotton is an essential plant worldwide (Campbell et al. 2010), mainly as a natural source of fiber (Haigler et al. 2012), oil (Singh et al. 2013), and protein for animal feeds (Rogers et al. 2002). However, due to the effects of abiotic stress factors such as cold, drought and salinity, high quantity and quality cotton production is steadily declining (Magwanga et al. 2018a, b). The adverse effect of drought and salinity stress conditions has intensified with ever-changing climate conditions. As a result, improving drought and salinity stress tolerance may mitigate osmotic stress-induced yield loss. Previous studies have demonstrated that drought and salt stresses induce the expression of osmotic stress-associated genes. Ribosomal protein large (RPL) is a gene family that was previously thought to be primarily involved in enhancing homeostasis inside the ribosomal complex and protein biosynthesis (Chaillou 2019). However, recent studies have demonstrated that abiotic stress factors regulate the transcription of genes coding for the RPL protein (Horiguchi et al. 2012). For example, GmRPL37 is highly expressed during cold stress in soybean and positively regulated cold tolerance (Kim et al. 2004). Overexpression of RPL44 in Aspergillus glaucus enhanced drought and salt stress tolerance (Liu et al. 2014). Overexpression of RPL23A in transgenic rice increased the water use efficiency and improved its tolerance to drought stress (Moin et al. 2017). In 2008, Rogalski found out that RPL33 in tobacco plants was not essential when plants are growing in suitable conditions but it was crucial in enhancing acclimation to cold stress (Rogalski et al. 2008). The RPL genes are characterized by multiple abiotic stresses and phytohormones cis-elements in their transcription regulatory regions, which respond specifically to stress and signal molecules (Moin et al. 20162017; Saha et al. 2017). MBS (Myb binding site) and low-temperature response (LTR), among others, are stress-responsive cis-elements widely distributed in the putative promoter regions of RPL genes. These responsive elements are associated with genes responsive to drought and cold stress, respectively (Zou et al. 2011). The presence of these cis-elements in the RPL gene promoter region suggests that they are involved in abiotic stress response and tolerance.

QTL mapping is one of the strategies developed and currently used to identify genes involved in different plant pathways (Kim et al. 2019). A BC2F2 population was obtained from Gossypium tomentosum as the donor parent, well-known for its drought tolerance, and G. hirsutum, as the recurrent parent, widely cultivated due to its high yielding but susceptible to drought and salt stress. A high-density genetic linkage map was developed by adopting genotyping by sequencing (GBS), integrating genotype and phenotype (Magwanga et al. 2018a, b). Several stable quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were identified and grouped into three main clusters focusing on the physiological related QTLs contributed by the donor parent G. tomentosum which were cell membrane stability (CMS), chlorophyll content, and saturated leaf weight (SLW). Within the QTL regions, 89 genes were mined, including Gh_D01G0234 (RPL14B). Further, they analyzed the 89 genes through RNA sequence data from the public domain database and validation through qRT-PCR under drought and found the genes to be upregulated (Magwanga et al. 2020).

The mined genes were of interest because they were contributed by the donor parent G. tomentosum. G. tomentosum is a wild cotton species that grows in saline and dry environment, making it resistant to drought and salt stress (Oluoch et al. 2016). Wild plant species are known to have traits that can enhance plant resistance to abiotic stress conditions and increase yield quantity and quality when introgressed into the cultivated cultivars (Des Roches et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2021). Therefore, this study focuses on the characterization and functional validation of the 60S ribosomal protein L14-2 (RPL14B) gene in cotton. Moreover, the various bioinformatics analysis about cis-regulatory elements, Gene ontology (GO) terms, conserved motif, gene structure, and phylogenetic relationship was also performed. Furthermore, the expression profiles of the RPL14B gene family were carried on different tissues under drought and salt stress. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) was used to verify the Gh_D01G0234 gene, and VIGS-plants were evaluated under drought and salt stress conditions. The results revealed that the RPL14B gene could have potential and significant role in stress tolerance. This work provides fundamental steps for future exploration of the RPL14B genes in improving cotton germplasm to develop climate-smart cotton varieties resilient to drought and salt stress factors.

Materials and methods

Phylogenetic tree analysis and physio-chemical properties of RPL14B protein

The sequences of the RPL14B were obtained from the three cotton genomes, A, D and AD. The tetraploid (AD) cotton was G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. tomentosum, G. mustelinum, and G. darwinii, while the diploid cotton (A and D) was G. arboreum and G. raimondii, respectively. The tetraploid cotton protein sequences were obtained from their respective genome databases through the Blastp program, while the diploid protein sequences were downloaded from the cotton functional genomics database (https://cottonfgd.org/CottonFGD). In order to identify the RLP14B genes with Pfam domain, all the genes were queried using the Pfam Scan (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/pfa/pfamscan/) and SMART search (http://smart.emblheidelberg. de/smart/). ClustalX and MEGA 7 programs were used to conduct multiple sequence alignments of the RPL14B protein sequences and construct the phylogenetic tree (Tamura et al. 2013; Thompson et al. 2002). The physical and chemical aspects of the RPL14B gene family were determined using the CottonFGD database.

Gene structure, motif identification and gene ontology enrichment analysis

Online tools, the gene structure displayer server (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn) and MEME Suite (http://meme-suite.org/) (Bailey et al. 2009; Hu et al. 2015), were used to determine the gene structure and conserved motif of RPL14B genes. We employed GO Analysis Toolkit and Database, AgriGO v2.0, to conduct gene ontology annotation of the RPL14B genes (www.bioinfo.cau.edu.cn/agriGO) (Tian et al. 2017).

Chromosomal allocation, cis-regulatory element prediction, and subcellular localization prediction

The information on RPL14B chromosome position was retrieved from the CottonGen website and using the chromosome information, mapping of the genes was done by Tbtools (Chen et al. 2020). The subcellular localization of the RLP14B proteins was determined through Wolfpsort (https://www.wolfpsort.hgc.jp/) (Hortona et al. 2005). G. hirsutum, G. raimondii, and G. arboreum 2 000 bp (base pairs) nucleotide sequence, retrieved from the cotton FGD database, were submitted to the Plant.

Plant material and treatment

Seeds of G. hirsutum, Marie-Galante 85 (MG-85) race were obtained from Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (ICR-CAAS). The seeds were first delinted using sulfuric acid then grown on moist absorbent paper for four days. The seedlings were transferred to a hydroponic set up with Hoagland nutrient solution (Vinet and Zhedanov 2011) in the climate-controlled greenhouse with 16 h light/8 h dark and the temperature at 28 °C, day and 25 °C night as previously described (Kirungu et al. 2020). At the three-leaf stage, the cotton seedlings were subjected to osmotic stress by adding to the Hoagland nutrient solution 17% of glycol PEG-6000 and 300 mmol·L−1 of sodium chloride for drought and salt treatment, respectively. To ensure the results were reliable, the untreated plants were used as the control. We collected samples in three biological replicates from the leaves, stem, and root tissues for RNA extraction at 0 h, 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h of post-stress exposure.

RNA extraction and RT-qPCR assays

The RNAprep Pure Plant kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) was used for RNA extraction by following its instructions. Quality and concentration of RNA were determined using agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometric analysis. The RNA with the correct concentration and purity was then converted to cDNA. The cDNA was prepared using EasyScript First-strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGene, Beijing, China). The primers were designed using primer 5, list attached (Additional file 1: Table S1), and the cotton GhActin gene forward sequence 5'-ATCCTCCGTCTTGACCTTG-3' and reverse sequence 5'-TGTCCGTCAGGCAACTCAT-3' was used as the internal control. The real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed as previously described (Lu et al. 2019). The fold change was analyzed using the \({2}^{-\Delta\Delta{\text{C}}_{\text {t}}}\) method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).

Validation of Gh_D01G0234 gene through Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), under drought and salt stress conditions.

Fragment of the coding DNA sequence of RPL14B (405 bp) was retrieved from the cotton functional genome database (https://cottonfgd.org/search/) and used to design its specific primer using the primer primer5 tool. The gene-specific primer, forward sequence: CGAGCTCCACGTGTTCCCAAGAAGAAGA, and reverse sequence: CCTCGAG TTGCTTGATGACTCCAGACCT were amplified using G. hirsutum cDNA by Bioer LifeECO PCR Thermal Cycler. The products were then cloned into the EcoR1 and BamH1 sites of the tobacco rattle virus vector (pTRV) to generate pTRV: RPL14B. The recombinant was then transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 strain using freeze and thaw method (Dupadahalli 2020). Preparation of the bacteria inoculum and inoculation to the plants' cotyledon was done as described by Corbin et al. (2017). For reliable results, we inoculated some plants with the silenced gene inoculum (pTRV: RPL14B), and phytoene desaturase (pTRV: PDS) to determine the effectiveness of the silencing, while other plants were inoculated with empty vector (pTRV: 00) and plants without any inoculum were denoted as the wild type and represented the control (Yang et al. 2019). Drought and salt stress simulation was done at the three-leaf stage by adding to the Hoagland solution 300 mmol·L­1 sodium chloride for salt treatment and 17% (W/V) of PEG-6000 for drought treatment (Yang et al. 2019), respectively. Sampling for physiological, morphological, and biochemical analysis was done on the leaf, stem, and root before treatment and 24 h after drought and salt treatments. The samples were then placed in liquid nitrogen. After that, they were kept at -80 °C.

Physiological and morphological analysis under drought and salt stress conditions

Samples in three bio-replicates were collected before treatment and 24 h post-stress treatment. We assessed the susceptibility and tolerance of silenced and non-silenced plants to stress by determining the physiological and morphological parameters. Excised leaf water loss (ELWL), relative leaf water content (RLWC), and cell membrane stability (CMS) were the physiological parameters determined as previously described by Cai et al. (2019). Briefly, to determine ELWL, fresh leaf samples were weighed, put on the bench for 24 h under normal room temperature and then weighed to get the wilted weight (WW). Afterward, the leaves were put inside a 50 °C dry oven for two days then weighed to get the dry weight (DW). ELWL is calculated by (FW − WW)/DW. To determine RLWC, the leaf sample's fresh weight was measured (FW) and then put in distilled water under normal room temperature for 24 h, surface dried, and weighed to get saturated weight (SW). After that, put the sample inside a 50° C dry oven for two days and weighed to get the dry weight. Calculation of RLWC was done using the formula, RLWC = ((FW − DW)/(SW − DW)) × 100. CMS was determined by quantifying plant electrolyte or ion leakage (Cai et al. 2019). Leaves from the silenced plants and the control with uniform diameter and weighing 0.5 g were put in tubes containing 5 mL distilled water and kept in the dark for 24 h. Then we measured the electrical conductivity (L1). The leaves were then autoclaved at 70 °C for 30 min and left to cool, and the electrical conductivity (L2) was measured. The formula used to calculate the cell membrane stability is (L1 − L0)/(L2 − L0) × 100 (L0 is the conductivity of distilled water).

The morphological parameters measured were the plant height (PH), root length (RL), shoot fresh weight (SFW), and root fresh weight (RFW). PH and RL were measured in centimeters, while SFW and RFW were measured in grams.

Evaluation of oxidants and antioxidants enzymes in VIGS plants and the wild types under drought and salt stress conditions

We further evaluated the effect of simulated osmotic stress on the silenced and the control plants by quantifying the oxidant enzyme and antioxidant enzyme activities. We evaluated the antioxidants and oxidants enzyme activities on VIGS plants, plants transfused with empty vector and the wild type under drought and salt stress conditions. According to the manufacturer's protocols, the extraction and spectrometric analysis of the oxidants and antioxidants enzymes activities were carried out using their respective assay kits supplied by Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology, China.

Results

Physio-chemical properties of the RPL14B protein in cotton

In evaluating the physio-chemical properties of the RPL14B proteins encoded by the RPL14B genes in G. hirsutum, G. arboreum and G.raimondii cotton species, the proteins were found to exhibit varied features. However, one common feature to all the proteins obtained from all the species was the grand average of hydropathy (GRAVY) values that ranged between 0.322 and –0.657. The negative GRAVY values denoted that the proteins encoded by the RPL genes were hydrophilic. The other properties varied among the cotton species (Additional file 1: Table S1). For instance, molecular weights of RPL14B genes in G. hirsutum ranged from 6.232 kDa to 15.723 kDa, and isoelectric point (pI) value ranged from 10.86 to 11.55. While in G. raimondii and G. arboreum, the molecular weight ranged from 10.714 kDa to 18.105 kDa, the pI was between 11.5 and 17. The diploid cotton species had a higher molecular weight and pI compared with the tetraploid cotton species ranging from −0.322 to −0.629 (Additional file 2: Table S2).

Phylogenetic analysis and chromosomal distribution of RPL14B protein in cotton

The cotton RPL14B proteins sequences were analyzed to determine its evolutionary pattern. By integrating the use of MEGA7, a phylogenetic tree was constructed after aligning the RPL14B protein sequences using ClustalX. The RPL14B proteins were grouped into three clusters (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the RPL genes were mapped into their respective chromosomes by use of Tbtools. The RPL14B genes are distributed in thirteen chromosomes in G. hirsutum. In the A genome is: A01, A02, A07, A09, A10, A11, A12, while those in the D genome, D01, D02, D03, D07, D09, D10, D11, and D13 with two genes mapped within the scaffold (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Phylogenetic tree analysis of RPL14 proteins in G. hirsutum, G. raimondii, G. arboreum, G. tomentosum, G. mustelinum, G. barbadense, and G. darwinii

Fig. 2
figure2

The distribution of RPL14B genes in chromosomes. A G. hirsutum, B G.raimondii and C G. arboreum

RPL14B gene structure, domain and conserved motif

The cotton RPL14B genes were interrupted by few introns in their gene structure (Fig. 3A–C). Few introns were associated with stress-responsive genes, as seen in previous studies on other stress-responsive genes in cotton, such as dehydrin (Kirungu et al. 2020). Thus, low intron interruption in RPL14B genes indicated that they are involved in stress acclimation mechanisms in cotton. Ribosomal domain(s) is an essential component of all ribosomal proteins. Most of the genes had the same type of motif (Fig. 4A). They also have RPL14-KOW conserved domains at their N-terminals that enable them to interact with other proteins (Fig. 4B). The motifs contain invariant glycine residues, which are composed of alternating blocks of hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues.

Fig. 3
figure3

Gene structure of cotton RPL14B proteins. A Gene structure of genes in G. hirsutum, B gene structure of G. arboreum genes, C gene structure of G. raimondii genes

Fig. 4
figure4

Motif and conserved domain present in RPL14B proteins. A Motif present in G.hirsurtum, G. arboreum and G. raimondii. B Conserved domain of GhRPL14B protein

Subcellular localization prediction, gene ontology annotations and cis-acting regulatory element

RPL14B genes were predicted to be sub-localized in the mitochondrion, nucleus, and endoplasmic reticulum. However, they are abundant in the nucleus, especially in the G. hirsutum (Fig. 5A). GO enrichment analysis showed that these genes have all GO functions: molecular function, biological process, and cellular component. Cellular components associated with this gene are ribosomes (GO:0005840), cell (GO:0005623), cytoplasm (GO:0005737), ribonucleoprotein complex (GO:0030529), and intracellular organelles (GO:0043229). RPL14B is part of metabolic and cellular cell processes. The molecular function is the structural molecule activity of the cell (GO:005198) and structural constituent of ribosome (GO:0003735) (Fig. 5B). The most relevant biological functions are biosynthetic process (GO:0009058), cellular metabolic process (GO:0044237), protein metabolic process (GO:0019538), gene expression (GO:0010467), and translation process (GO:0006412). The RPL14B genes in G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. raimondii, and G. arboreum species have stress-related cis-regulatory elements. The cis-regulatory elements obtained are shown in Fig. 5C; all the identified cis-regulatory elements are involved in phytohormones and abiotic stress response.

Fig. 5
figure5

Subcellular localization, GO analysis and cis-regulatory element. A Subcellular localization of RPL14B genes in G. hirsutum, G. raimondii, and G. arboreum. B Go annotation of biological process, cellular component, and molecular functions identified in GhRPL14B genes. C Cis-regulatory elements obtained from G. hirsutum, G. raimondii, G. arboreum, and G. barbadense

Expression of RPL14B genes in upland cotton under drought and salt stress

The expression analysis of GhRPL14B genes was assayed through RT-qPCR. The expression levels of the genes under drought and salt stress were different (Fig. 6). In the leaf, the expression was higher from 12 to 48 h under both drought and salt stress. While in the roots, the expression level was high from the onset of stress, at 3 h, they were highly expressed, and the expression levels were differential onwards up to 48 h under stress conditions.

Fig. 6
figure6

Differential expression of GhRPL14B genes under drought and salt stress. A Heat map of the RPL14B gene expression in the leaf under drought stress conditions. B Heat map of the RPL14B gene expression in the leaf under salt stress condition. C Heat map of the RPL14B gene expression in the root under drought stress conditions. D Heat map of the RPL14B gene expression in the root under salt stress condition. Yellow mark depicts a high expression level of the genes, and blue mark depicts a low expression level of genes. Black mark depicts no expression of the genes at a particular time

Evaluation of the efficiency of RPL14B gene silencing

The effectiveness of silencing the RPL14B gene in cotton was evaluated using the phytoene desaturase (PDS) gene. Previous research has shown that PDS can be used as a positive control to evaluate the effectiveness of silencing a particular gene. Plants infiltrated with PDS tend to exhibit a photobleached leaf phenotype that extends to the stem. In this experiment, the plants infused with pTRV2: PDS showed albino trait after 2 weeks of post-inoculation. The leaves and upper part of the stem exhibited this chlorotic/ bleached phenotype (Fig. 7A). RT-qPCR analysis to determine expression levels of RPL14B gene in the silenced plants and the wild type showed lower gene expression levels in the silenced plants relative to the wild type. This demonstrates that this gene's silencing was successful, and the vector used was effective (Fig. 7B).

Fig. 7
figure7

The efficiency of virus-induced gene silencing in the cotton seedlings. A The albino change on the plants under being inoculated with TRV: PDS after 14 days. B Expression levels of the knocked gene in WT and VIGS-plants under normal conditions (control), drought and salt stress. Bar indicates the standard error (SE). Different letters indicate the significant differences between the wild type (WT) and the VIGS-plants (ANOVA; P < 0.05)

Evaluation of morphological and physiological traits of the VIGS-plant and the wild type (WT) under drought and salt conditions

RPL14B silenced plants and the control plants under normal conditions exhibited no physiological or morphological changes. However, when the plants were subjected to drought and/or salt stress conditions, the plants showed some wilting elements and indicated that they were stressed (Fig. 8A, B). The PH, RL, and RFW exhibited significant difference between the VIGS plants and the control (Fig. 8C–E). The silenced Gh_D01G0234 cotton leaves showed a significant reduction in RLWC relative to the wild type and TRV2:00 leaves. Whereas there was a relative increase in ELWL and ion leakage compared with the wild type and TRV2:00 leaves. An increase in ion leakage and ELWL demonstrates that this gene's silencing compromises the plant's effectiveness in tolerating drought stress (Fig. 9A i–iii).

Fig. 8
figure8

Morphological evaluation of the VIGS-plants and the wild types (WT) under drought and salt stress conditions. A Phenotype observation of TRV2: GhRPL14B, TRV2:00 and WT 24 h after (250 mmol·L–1 NaCl) salt treatment. B Phenotype observation of TRV2: GhRPL14B, TRV2:00 24 h after 17% PEG treatment. Morphological parameters, C root fresh weight (RFW), D root length (RL), and E plant height (PH). Bar indicates the standard error (SE). Different letters indicate the significant differences between the wild type (WT) and VIGS-plants (ANOVA; P < 0.05)

Fig. 9
figure9

Physiological analysis and Biochemical assays of the oxidant and antioxidant in VIGS plants under drought and salt stress conditions. A (i) Quantitative determination of relative leaf water content (RLWC), (ii) excised leaf water loss (ELWL), and (iii) Quantitative determination of ion leakage as a measure of cell membrane stability (CMS). B Biochemical analysis (i) Quantitative determination of peroxidase (POD), (ii) Quantitative determination of catalase (CAT), and (iii) quantitative determination of Malondialdehyde (MDA). The bar indicates a standard error (SE). Different letters indicate the significant differences between the wild type and the VIGS-plants (ANOVA; P < 0.05)

Oxidant and antioxidant enzymes assay

The plants were further analyzed for the levels of oxidant and antioxidant enzymes. These enzymes were assayed on the VIGS plant's leaf tissue and the wild type under drought and salt stress conditions. The antioxidants peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) level in VIGS plants was significantly reduced compared with the wild type. In contrast, the oxidant MDA level was significantly high in VIGS plants compared with the wild type (Fig. 9B). This result demonstrates that the silencing of RPL14B compromises the plant's ability to tolerate drought and salt stress.

Discussion

Ribosomal protein is involved in abiotic stress tolerance

Abiotic stress factors like drought and salt have exacerbated cotton production with an estimated loss of 70%. Plants being sessile initiates signaling pathways, activation of transcriptional factors and eventually expression of stress-responsive genes, all are to ensure plant survival. It is imperative to identify genes involved in sustaining plant growth and development during abiotic stress to improve their productivity further. The RPL gene family has been known to be involved with the housekeeping of the ribosome. However, recent studies have demonstrated that ribosomal protein has evolved (Horiguchi et al. 2012), and they are involved in extra ribosomal activities like biotic (Li 2019) and abiotic stress tolerance (Mukhopadhyay et al. 2011). Under abiotic stress, plants increase protein production as a metabolic response (Song et al. 2014). Under stress conditions, protein in the plant undergoes denaturation, and it is crucial to maintain the homeostasis between protein synthesis and degradation to ensure a normal metabolic process (Byrne 2009). Several studies have been done in several plants, for instance, rice (Moin et al. 2017), tobacco (Liu et al. 2014), and Arabidopsis (Sormani et al. 2011) whereby many RPL genes are upregulated in response to abiotic stress suggesting that they are involved in maintaining or improving protein biosynthesis enabling plants to acclimatize to stress. All these studies demonstrated that ribosomal protein is involved in abiotic stress tolerance.

Evolution analysis and physicochemical properties of the proteins encoded by the RPL14B genes in cotton

In this study, the phylogenetic tree results showed that the RPL proteins have diverse distribution and could perhaps have a common origin. Similar results have been shown in various subtypes of the Late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, in which the various classes showed wider distribution across the three cotton genomes, A, D, and AD (Magwanga et al. 2018a, b). Three cotton species had different numbers of genes, which had the RPL14B functional domain. Twenty-six, 5, and 8 genes were found in G. hirsutum (AD), G. raimondii (D), and G. arboreum (A), respectively. Moreover, evaluating the proteins encoded by the RPL14B genes, all were found to have negative GRAVY values, which implied that the proteins encoded by the RPL14B genes were hydrophilic. The GRAVY values are important protein property because it indicates the protein's behavior in relation to water. Hydrophilic genes have been correlated with the role of enhancing the survival of plants and animals in periods of stress, putatively through safeguarding enzymatic function and prevention of aggregation in times of dehydration and or heat stress. For instance, researches on the LEA2 gene in cotton found that they were hydrophilic and conferred to enhance drought stress acclimation (Magwanga et al. 2018a, b).

Subcellular localization and motif identification of RPL14B protein

The nucleus has an integral role in cell functioning. This involves regulating of gene expression under different internal and external conditions and regulates the synthesis of proteins. The majority of RPL14B were located in the nucleus. RPL14B has the RPL14-KOW motif at its N-terminal. KOW motif has been identified in some large ribosomal proteins (Kyrpides et al. 1996). This motif contains invariant glycine residue, which is composed of alternating blocks of hydrophilic and hydrophobic residue. The KOW motif is common among other ribosomal protein families like RPL 19, 21.2, 24b, and 26; this shows the evolutionary relationship between this gene and the KOW motif family. KOW motif is involved in protein–protein interaction and links ribosomal protein with transcription factors that respond to abiotic stress (Moin et al. 2016).

RPL14B protein interacts with other RPLs in response to abiotic stress

This protein interacts with others like RPL 3, 4, 18, 19, 23, and ubiquitin. Some of these genes are involved in stress responses. For instance, overexpression of RPL23A in rice enhanced the water use efficiency of the plants under abiotic stress (Moin et al. 2017). Several studies have demonstrated that ubiquitin is an abiotic stress signaling molecule in plants, and they promote protein interaction in response to abiotic stress (Stone 2014). RPL14 interacts with RPL3 and RPL19 together with the rRNA of the RPL and upholds the ribosome's stability (Tiller et al. 2012). Previous studies have shown that RPL19 was upregulated and enhanced tolerance to drought stress. It is also involved in the thymidylate synthase gene splicing and the regulation of protein synthesis during photosynthesis (Semrad and Schroeder 1998). For plant adaptive responses to drought and salinity, transcription of stress-related genes associated with tolerance mechanisms and pathways is essential. Under drought and salt stresses, stress-related proteins interact with others and induce their transcription to initiate appropriate responses. Therefore the interaction of these genes enhances stress response and tolerance.

Abiotic stress cis-regulatory elements identified in the promoter region of RPL14B genes

The cis-regulatory elements upstream of the transcription factor region play an active role in activating and suppressing genes in response to stress conditions (Zhao et al. 2014). The presence of several stress-responsive cis-regulatory elements in the putative promoter regions of the RPL14B gene reveals that this gene activity alleviates the plant's stress effects. In addition to abiotic stresses, elements that respond to phytohormones were identified. ABRE (Abscisic acid-responsive element), TGACG-motif and CGTCA-motif responsive to MeJa, TCA-motif responsive to salicylic acid, and TGA-motif responsive to Auxin were identified. Previous researches on RPL stress-responsive gene families in rice identified similar cis-regulatory (Moin et al. 2017; Saha et al. 2017). This suggests RPL14B gene enhances plant’s adaptation and tolerance to abiotic stress and participates in signal pathways during abiotic stress conditions.

Knockdown of GhRPL14B gene increases the sensitivity of upland cotton to drought and salt stresses

VIGS is a versatile tool for functional characterization and has been extensively utilized to study gene function in different plants (Corbin et al. 2017). Moreover, the RPL14B (Gh_D01G0234) gene was knocked down in upland cotton through VIGS for further evaluation. The silenced Gh_D01G0234 plants exhibited a susceptibility phenotype compared with the control. The FLW, SFW, FRW, RLWC, and chlorophyll content of the VIGS plants were lower than that of the control (empty vector and wild plants), while ELWL and ion leakage were higher in VIGS plants compared with the control plants. Similar observations were observed in which plants exhibited wilting behaviors when exposed to either osmotic or salinity stress conditions (Fathi and Tari 2016). This results indicated that the VIGS plants experienced reduced water retention and photosynthetic activities. Thus, they were more susceptible to drought and salt stress compared with the control plants. The transpiration rate in plants under stress increase when its stress tolerance mechanisms are compromised (Suzuki et al. 2014). Biochemical analysis showed a higher concentration level of MDA and a lower level of POD, and CAT, in VIGS plants relative to the control plants. A higher amount of oxidant means VIGS plants were experiencing oxidative stress under drought and salt stress conditions. Drought stress results in the upregulation of oxidants due to the lack of homeostasis between oxidants and antioxidants. Oxidative stress results in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The ROS are incredibly toxic and can cause damage to the plant tissues and eventually cell death. Plants use ROS to aid in the signal transduction process in response to various stimuli and offer the plant defense to abiotic stress (Mehla et al. 2017). Oxidants and antioxidants have been used as biochemical markers for drought stress in various studies; upregulation of oxidants and downregulation of antioxidants indicate the plant is under stress.

Conclusions

This study provides an insight into the role of the RPL14B gene during drought and salt stresses conditions. The RP genes are involved in stabilizing the ribosomes and interacting with other genes, enhancing plant acclimation to unfavorable conditions. The presence of cis-regulatory elements and increased expression of the RPL14B gene during drought and salt stress proves that RPL genes have evolved and are involved in extra ribosomal activities. The ability to tolerate the effects of osmotic and salt stress of VIGS-plants was significantly compromised. The VIGS plants recorded significantly higher concentrations of oxidant enzymes and a reduction in the concentration levels of the antioxidant enzymes, which revealed that the VIGS plants suffered more severe oxidative stresses than the wild types under osmotic and salt stress conditions. This work lays the very first foundation for further investigations of the specific functions of these RPL14B proteins in cotton about drought stress and other abiotic stress factors.

References

  1. Bailey L, Boden M, Buske FA, et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(suppl. 2):W202–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp335.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne ME. A role for the ribosome in development. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14(9):512–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.06.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cai X, Magwanga RO, Xu Y, et al. Comparative transcriptome, physiological and biochemical analyses reveal response mechanism mediated by CBF4 and ICE2 in enhancing cold stress tolerance in Gossypium thurberi. AoB Plants. 2019;11(6):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plz045.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell BT, Saha S, Percy R, et al. Status of the global cotton germplasm resources. Crop Sci. 2010;50(4):1161–79. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.09.0551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaillou T. Ribosome specialization and its potential role in the control of protein translation and skeletal muscle size. J Appl Physiol. 2019;127(2):599–607. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00946.2018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Corbin C, Lafontaine F, Sepúlveda LJ, et al. Virus-induced gene silencing in Rauwolfia species. Protoplasma. 2017;254(4):1813–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1079-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Des Roches S, Post DM, Turley NE, et al. The ecological importance of intraspecific variation. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2(1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0402-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dupadahalli K. A modified freeze—thaw method for efficient transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Curr Sci. 2020;93(6):3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fathi A, Tari DB. Effect of drought stress and its mechanism in plants. Int J Life Sci. 2016;10(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijls.v10i1.14509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haigler CH, Betancur L, StiffM R, et al. Cotton fiber: a powerful single-cell model for cell wall and cellulose research. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3(104):104. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00104.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Horiguchi G, Van Lijsebettens M, Candela H, et al. Ribosomes and translation in plant developmental control. Plant Sci. 2012;191–2:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.04.008.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hortona P, Park KJ, Obayashi T, et al. Protein subcellular localization prediction with WoLF PSORT. In: Jiang T, Yang UC, Chen YP, Wong L, editors. Series on advances in bioinformatics and computational biology. Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Conference, vol. 3. 2005. p. 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781860947292_0007.

  14. Hu B, Jin J, Guo AY, et al. GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(8):1296–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim KY, Park SW, Chung YS, et al. Molecular cloning of low-temperature-inducible ribosomal proteins from soybean. J Exp Bot. 2004;55(399):1153–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh125.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim CK, Oh JH, Na JK, et al. The genes associated with drought tolerance by multi-layer approach in potato. Plant Breed Biotechnol. 2019;7(4):405–14. https://doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2019.7.4.405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirungu JN, Magwanga RO, Pu L, et al. Knockdown of Gh_A05G1554 (GhDHN_03) and Gh_D05G1729 (GhDHN_04) dehydrin genes, reveals their potential role in enhancing osmotic and salt tolerance in cotton. Genomics. 2020;112(2):1902–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.11.003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kyrpides NC, Woese CR, Ouzounis CA. KOW: a novel motif linking a bacterial transcription factor with ribosomal proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1996;21(11):425–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(96)30036-4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li S. Regulation of ribosomal proteins on viral infection. Cells. 2019;8(5):508. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8050508.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu XD, Xie L, Wei Y, et al. Abiotic stress resistance, a novel moonlighting function of ribosomal protein RPL44 in the halophilic fungus Aspergillus glaucus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(14):4294–300. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00292-14.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the \({2}^{-\Delta\Delta{\text{C}}_{\text {T}}}\) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu P, Magwanga RO, Kirungu JN, et al. Overexpression of cotton a DTX/MATE gene enhances drought, salt, and cold stress tolerance in transgenic arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10(March):299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Magwanga RO, Lu P, Kirungu JN, et al. GBS mapping and analysis of genes conserved between Gossypium tomentosum and Gossypium hirsutum cotton cultivars that respond to drought stress at the seedling stage of the BC2F2 generation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018a;19(6):1614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061614.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Magwanga RO, Lu P, Kirungu JN, et al. Cotton late embryogenesis abundant (LEA2) genes promote root growth and confer drought stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. G3 Genes Genom Genet. 2018b;8(8):2781–803. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.200423.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Magwanga RO, Lu P, Kirungu JN, et al. Identification of QTLs and candidate genes for physiological traits associated with drought tolerance in cotton. J Cotton Res. 2020;3(1):1–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-020-0043-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mehla N, Sindhi V, Josula D, et al. An introduction to antioxidants and their roles in plant stress tolerance. In: Khan MIR, Khan NA, editors. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant systems in plants: role and regulation under abiotic stress. Singapore: Springer. 2017; p. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5254-5_1.

  27. Moin M, Bakshi A, Saha A, et al. Rice ribosomal protein large subunit genes and their spatio-temporal and stress regulation. Front Plant Sci. 2016;24(7):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moin M, Bakshi A, Madhav MS, Kirti PB. Expression profiling of ribosomal protein gene family in dehydration stress responses and characterization of transgenic rice plants overexpressing RPL23A for water-use efficiency and tolerance to drought and salt stresses. Front Chem. 2017;5(11):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2017.00097.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mukhopadhyay P, Reddy MK, Singla-Pareek SL, et al. Transcriptional downregulation of rice rpL32 gene under abiotic stress is associated with removal of transcription factors within the promoter region. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(11): e28058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028058.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Oluoch G, Zheng J, Wang X, et al. QTL mapping for salt tolerance at seedling stage in the interspecific cross of Gossypium tomentosum with Gossypium hirsutum. Euphytica. 2016;209(1):223–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1674-6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rogalski M, Schöttler MA, Thiele W, et al. Rpl33, a nonessential plastid-encoded ribosomal protein in tobacco, is required under cold stress conditions. Plant Cell. 2008;20(8):2221–37. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.060392.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers GM, Poore MH, Paschal JC. Feeding cotton products to cattle. Vet Clin N Am Food Anim Pract. 2002;18(2):267–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0720(02)00020-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saha A, Das S, Moin M, et al. Genome-wide identification and comprehensive expression profiling of ribosomal protein small subunit (RPS) genes and their comparative analysis with the large subunit (RPL) genes in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1553. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Semrad K, Schroeder R. A ribosomal function is necessary for efficient splicing of the T4 phage thymidylate synthase intron in vivo. Genes Dev. 1998;12(9):1327–37. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.9.1327.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh V, Kendall RJ, Hake K, et al. Crude oil sorption by raw cotton. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52(18):6277–81. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4005942.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Song J, Wei X, Shao G, et al. The rice nuclear gene WLP1 encoding a chloroplast ribosome L13 protein is needed for chloroplast development in rice grown under low temperature conditions. Plant Mol Biol. 2014;84(3):301–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-013-0134-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sormani R, Masclaux-Daubresse C, Daniele-Vedele F, et al. Transcriptional regulation of ribosome components are determined by stress according to cellular compartments in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12): e28070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028070.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Stone SL. The role of ubiquitin and the 26S proteasome in plant abiotic stress signaling. Front Plant Sci. 2014;16(5):135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Suzuki N, Rivero RM, Shulaev V, et al. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 2014;203(1):32–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, et al. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Bio Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. Multiple sequence alignment using clustalW and clustalX. Curr Protoc Bioinform. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tian T, Liu Y, Yan H, et al. AgriGO v2.0: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community, 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1):W122–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx382.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tiller N, Weingartner M, Thiele W, et al. The plastid-specific ribosomal proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana can be divided into non-essential proteins and genuine ribosomal proteins. Plant J. 2012;69(2):302–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04791.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vinet L, Zhedanov A. A “missing” family of classical orthogonal polynomials. J Phys A Math Theor. 2011;44(8):29–31. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang L, He S, Dia S, et al. Industrial crops & products alien genomic introgressions enhanced fiber strength in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Ind Crops Prod. 2021;159:113028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.113028.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang X, Kirungu JN, Magwanga RO, et al. Knockdown of GhIQD31 and GhIQD32 increases drought and salt stress sensitivity in Gossypium hirsutum. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;144:166–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.027.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhao T, Xia H, Liu J, et al. The gene family of dehydration responsive element-binding transcription factors in grape (Vitis vinifera): Genome-wide identification and analysis, expression profiles, and involvement in abiotic stress resistance. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(3):1577–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-013-3004-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zou C, Sun K, Mackaluso JD, et al. Cis-regulatory code of stress-responsive transcription in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(36):14992–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103202108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (31621005, 31530053, and 31671745), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences financially sponsored this research program.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Shiraku ML, Magwanga RO and Liu F designed the study. Shiraku ML performed the experiment and collected data. Shiraku ML, Magwanga RO, Cai XY, Xu YC, and Mehari TG analyzed the data. Shiraku ML wrote the manuscript. Kirungu JN, Hou YQ, Wang YH, Peng RH, Wang KB review the manuscript. Supervision: Liu F and Zhou ZL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to PENG Renhai, ZHOU Zhongli or LIU Fang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Physiochemical properties of the proteins encoded by the RPL14B genes.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

List of primers for the RT-qPCR profiling of the cotton RPL14B gene under drought and salt stress conditions.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

SHIRAKU, M.L., MAGWANGA, R.O., CAI, X. et al. Knockdown of 60S ribosomal protein L14-2 reveals their potential regulatory roles to enhance drought and salt tolerance in cotton. J Cotton Res 4, 27 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-021-00102-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Abiotic stress
  • Cotton
  • Ribosomal protein large
  • Transcription factor
  • Virus-induced gene silencing