Dynamic profiles of DNA methylation and the interaction with histone acetylation during fiber cell initiation of Gossypium hirsutum
Journal of Cotton Research volume 5, Article number: 8 (2022)
Fiber, as the main product of cotton, provides main raw material for the textile industry. Many key factors have been revealed a significant role in fiber cell development including Myb proteins, phytohormones, fatty acid metabolites, and epigenetic modifications. DNA methylation is one of the important epigenetic modifications to regulate plant development and responses to abiotic or biotic stimuli. In general, DNA methylation consisting of 5mC and 6mA regulates the chromatin structure and gene transcription to affect plant development, however, the detailed role and underlying mechanism of DNA methylation in the fiber development of cotton are yet vague.
Here, systematical study of the 5mC and 6mA DNA methylation profiles during the fiber initiation period of Xu142 and its glabrous mutant Xu142fl represented a clear alteration of global DNA methylation associated with fiber cell initiation. Then, the genome-wide identification of genes responsible for methylation regulation at the fifth carbon of cytosine and the sixth carbon of adenine of DNA was operated in Gossypium hirsutum. As a result, 13, 10, 6, and 17 genes were identified for 5mC methylation, 5mC demethylation, 6mA methylation, and 6mA demethylation, respectively. We then investigated the tissue expression pattern of all these genes, and some genes showed higher expression levels in fiber initiation, among which some displayed a significant change in transcription between Xu142 and Xu142fl. The possible interaction between histone acetylation and DNA methylation in fiber initiation through in vitro culture was studied by dot blot, and the results showed that repressed histone deacetylation by Trichostatin A (TSA) inhibited the global DNA methylation, and some causal genes (e. g., GhDMT13, GhDAMT2, GhALKBH12, GhDM7) were also identified.
In this study, all the findings indicated the interplay between histone acetylation and DNA methylation, supporting their important roles and providing precious clues for the epigenetic modifications associated with DNA methylation in the fiber development of cotton.
As one of the most important cash crops, cotton has been planted worldwide and was paid much effort to improve its yield and fiber quality. Fiber, as the main product of cotton needs about 50 days to mature from fiber cell initiation with four different yet overlapping stages: initiation, elongation, secondary wall deposition, and maturation (Qin and Zhu 2011). Much progress has been made to explore the underlying mechanisms of fiber cell development, and many key genes and associated pathways have been identified, among which epigenetic mechanism play an important role (Du et al. 2018; Li et al. 2015; Qin and Zhu 2011; Sun et al. 2017).
Epigenetic modification characterizing the modulation of heritable phenotypic changes without any alteration in DNA sequence, has been proved to be a principal regulatory mechanism involved in diverse physiological or developmental processes. The research area of epigenetics covers various topics, typically including DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, histone modification, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), etc. (Katada et al. 2012). All of these have been studied extensively so far and showed their crucial roles in plant development including cotton fiber development (Feng et al. 2018; Guan et al. 2014; Kumar et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2019b). Even so, the detailed key factors or mechanisms associated with DNA methylation, a well-known and crucial epigenetic modification is unclear in regulating fiber development. With the development of detection methodologies and high-throughput sequencing, the genome-wide features of 6mA, another type of DNA methylation are being uncovered and studied to reveal its role and mechanisms in eukaryotes. Consequently, recent studies have illuminated the potential regulatory role of 6mA DNA modification in eukaryotes (Fu et al. 2015; Greer et al. 2015; Liang et al. 2018; Wu et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2015). In Arabidopsis, 6mA sites are broadly distributed across the genome at different developmental stages, and further study revealed that 6mA DNA modification positively correlates with actively expressed genes with the different context of 6mA sites from other organisms (Liang et al. 2018). However, whether 6mA DNA modification occurs in the cotton genome is still unknown, although some genome-wide DNA methylation assays indicated the distribution and role of DNA methylation (e.g., 5mC at CHH and CHG sites) in fiber development (Song et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2016).
The interactions among different epigenetic modifications is common and complex. Studies have disclosed that 5mC and 6mA DNA methylations are the most common types of DNA modifications in eukaryotes and prokaryotes (Johnson et al. 2002; Orouji et al. 2020; Tamaru et al. 2003; Xiao et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2015). Furthermore, 5mC is generated by DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) and removed by DNA glycosylase (DML), respectively (Jones and Takai 2001). While, AMT and ALKBH have been demonstrated as the methyltransferase and demethylase responsible for 6mA modification, respectively (Xiao et al. 2018). Recently, an RNA methylome presented the crosstalk between RNA and DNA methylation in fruit ripening. The expression of demethylase SIALKBH2 which causes the m6A reduction on fruit-ripening gene transcripts, is regulated by the 5mC demethylase SIDML2. In turn, SIALKBH2-mediated m6A RNA demethylation modulates the stability of SlDML2, and mutation of SIALKBH2 reduces the SlDML2 transcription levels and delays fruit ripening (Zhao et al. 2021; Zhou et al. 2019), showing a feedback loop between 5mC DNA methylation and m6A RNA methylation.
In Neurospora, DIM-5 encodes a specific histone H3 methylase responsible for lysine 9 tri-methylation (K9Me3) and DIM-5 mutation showed complete loss of DNA methylation suggesting that H3K9Me3 is an epigenetic mark that involved in the maintenance of DNA methylation in Neurospora (Tamaru and Selker 2001; Tamaru et al. 2003). However, in Arabidopsis, the mutation in KRYPTONITE (KYP) which is the first reported H3K9-specific methyltransferase in plant, results in normal phenotype and unaffected level of CG methylation, revealing that H3K9Me is not necessary for gene silencing maintenance (Jackson et al. 2002; Johnson et al. 2002). The different correlations between DNA methylation and histone methylation in Neurospora and plants indicate the functional diversification of epigenetic modification in the evolution of organisms.
Studies also implied that the DNA demethylation complex identifies acetylated H3K18 and H3K23 by REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 4 (ROS4)/INCREASED DNA METHYLATION 1 (IDM1) for DNA demethylation at some loci, in which the histone acetyltransferase IDM1 functions on the same genetic pathway of ROS1 in DNA demethylation regulation suggesting the prerequisite of histone acetylation for active DNA demethylation (Qian et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2015; Zhao et al. 2014). Peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase 4 (ACX4), which is responsible for the fatty acid β-oxidation, influences the nuclear histone acetylation and DNA methylation at some endogenous genomic loci and is also a target of the demethylation enzyme ROS1 (Wang et al. 2019a). This further supports the implicated interaction between DNA methylation and histone acetylation. Up to now, both DNA methylation and histone acetylation show an important regulatory role in fiber development (Kumar et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2016), however, the underlying mechanisms and the interplay between them are almost blank in the fiber initiation. Here, using the known glabrous cotton Xu142fl and its counterpart Xu142, we systematically investigated the dynamics of DNA methylation level including 5mC and 6mA, the interaction between DNA methylation and histone acetylation during fiber initiation, and then screened the potential responsible genes for DNA methylation regulation to provide clues for the epigenetic mechanisms underlying fiber initiation.
Global DNA methylation assay during fiber initiation of Xu142fl and its counterpart plant
A previous study indicated the important role of DNA methylation in fiber development (Wang et al. 2016), however, the underlying mechanism is obscure. As the known glabrous cotton, Xu142fl has been studied widely to uncover the fiber initiation mechanisms (Hu et al. 2018; Singh et al. 2020; Wan et al. 2016; Wu et al. 2018). Here, Xu142fl and Xu142 were used to investigate the potential role of DNA methylation in fiber initiation. First, with the specific 5mC and 6mA antibodies and dot blot assays, the dynamics of DNA methylation level in Xu142fl and Xu142 during the fiber initiation period was detected. According to the results, the 5mC level decreased weakly in 0 days post anthesis (DPA) ovules, while increased significantly in 5 DPA ovules of Xu142fl compared with the wild type (WT, Xu142). The further study indicated that little 5mC was detected in the 5 DPA fibers. In contrast, the 6mA level decreased weakly in −2 and 0 DPA ovules, while increased significantly in 5 DPA ovules of Xu142fl compared with WT. Same as 5mC, faint dot of 6mA was determined in the 5 DPA fibers of Xu142 (Fig. 1).
Genome-wide identification of genes responsible for the DNA methylation in Gossypium
To investigate the potential genes responsible for DNA (de)methylation in fiber initiation, the genome-wide identification of DNA (de)methylase encoding genes were operated. The worm and human protein sequences were used as queries to identify the DNA 6mA methyltransferase (GhDAMT) and demethylase (GhALKBH) in Gossypium hirsutum and other plant species, respectively (Deniz et al. 2019; Greer et al. 2015). Furthermore, the previous reports and public genome data were also referred for the DNA 5mC methyltransferase (GhDMT) and demethylase (GhDM) identification (Jin et al. 2013; Sun et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2019a).
In total 13, 10, 6, and 17 potential genes were identified for 5mC methylation, 5mC demethylation, 6mA methylation, and 6mA demethylation, respectively (Additional file 2: Table S1). After that, the names were given according to the positions of methyltransferase and demethylase encoding genes on their chromosomes. The genome-wide identification and evolutionary analysis of 5mC methyltransferase and demethylase have been operated as described previously (Jin et al. 2013; Sun et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2019a). The genes responsible for 6mA methylation and demethylation were identified from other species. Consequently, every three genes encoding GhDAMT were identified in Arabidopsis thaliana, Glycine max, Theobroma cacao, Vitis vinifera, Oryza sativa, and Populus trichocarpa. For the GhALKBH encoding genes, 13, 11, 9, 10, 9, and 9 genes were identified in A. thaliana, G. max, T. cacao, V. vinifera, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa, respectively (Additional file 2: Table S1).
Furthermore, the evolutionary relationships among 24 DNA 6mA methyltransferase genes of all referred to plant species were investigated. The evolutionary analysis divided the 6mA methyltransferase genes into three classes as DAMT-A to DAMT-C (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, the number of genes in each group is equal and two genes from G. hirsutum and each one gene from the other six species constitute a group, which indicated that DAMT genes may play conserved and general roles during plant evolution. Moreover, the 6mA demethylase genes were sorted into six classes as ALKBH-A to ALKBH-F in the phylogenetic tree analysis (Fig. 2B). Among which, groups ALKBH-B (21 genes) and ALKBH-E (7 genes) are the largest and smallest groups, respectively. Other groups contained different gene numbers from 8 to 16, and each group harbored the genes from all the other species is in agreement with the evolution analysis of the DAMT family in part. The phylogenetic analysis further showed that both ALKBH and DAMT genes in G. hirsutum always displayed a close distance with that in T. cacao in the phylogenetic tree, implying their close relationship and potential common progenitor as before (Li et al. 2014). Furthermore, the more predicted number of DNA methyltransferase and demethylase genes in G. hirsutum compared with other species suggested the gene duplication events and expansion due to polyploidization (Additional file 2: Table S1).
Chromosomal distribution and gene duplication analysis
The distribution of the predicted DNA 6mA methyltransferase and demethylase genes on the chromosomes of G. hirsutum genome (At and Dt sub-genome) was analyzed by TBtools. Chromosomal location analysis revealed that all the genes were unevenly distributed on 18 chromosomes (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). A total of 6 DNA methyltransferase genes were evenly distributed on chromosomes 6, 7, and 12 in At and Dt sub-genomes, while a total of 17 DNA demethylase genes were unevenly distributed on chromosomes 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12 among At and Dt subgenomes. Among them, 6, 9, and 11 chromosomes from At and 6, 9, 11, and 12 chromosomes from Dt sub-genome harbored only one gene, while 4 and 12 chromosomes of At as well as 4 and 10 of Dt sub-genome harbored two genes, respectively. The imbalanced distribution of methyltransferase and demethylase genes for 6mA among chromosomes indicated the complicated gene expansion due to different chromosome sizes and structures in G. hirsutum genome.
Intron/exon structure and protein motifs analysis of GhDAMT and GhALKBH gene families
Gene structure analysis is also an important strategy to study genetic evolution and gene function. The phylogenetic tree was built to analyze the gene structure and conserved motifs distribution of DNA 6mA methyltransferase and DNA demethylase family members in G. hirsutum. The phylogenetic tree classified the DNA methyltransferase GhDAMT genes into three groups although gene structure revealed that 6∼9 exons exist in all GhDAMT genes. The conserved protein motif analysis showed that all 8 protein motifs were randomly distributed between GhDAMT1 and GhDAMT2. Motif 8 was not found in GhDAMT3 or GhDAMT4 however motif 6 and 8 were not identified in GhDAMT5 and GhDAMT6. Interestingly, it is noticed that a big exon spans almost half of the entire gene in GhDAMT3 and GhDAMT4 which did not display any potential functional motif (Fig. 3A).
The phylogenetic tree also classified the DNA demethylase (GhALKBH) genes into three groups. The DNA demethylase genes bear a similar gene structure with 4 to 7 exons. The conserved motif distribution analysis showed that most GhALKBH genes exhibit similar motif structures, of which motif 1, 6, 7 are common to most genes and motif 3 and 5 are unique to GhALKBH1, GhALKBH10, GhALKBH16, and GhALKBH7. While, motif 8 only existed in GhALKBH3, GhALKBH12, GhALKBH6, and GhALKBH15 (Fig. 3B).
Collectively, the gene structure of the GhDAMT and GhALKBH gene families was found to be conserved, however, the differences in gene structure and conserved motifs in different groups indicated functional diversity of the GhDAMT and GhALKBH family genes in G. hirsutum.
Tissues specific expression of DNA methyltransferase and demethylase genes
Gene spatiotemporal expression is linked with the corresponding biological function. To investigate the expression profiles of different methyltransferase and demethylase genes, RNA-seq data were downloaded from NCBI to generate a heatmap. Then, transcription of each gene was analyzed at different developmental stages. The resulting heatmaps demonstrated that about half of the GhDMTs (i.e. GhDMT1, GhDMT4, GhDMT7, GhDMT9, GhDMT11, and GhDMT13) and two genes GhDM2 and GhDM7 encoding 5mC demethylase exhibited higher expression levels in ovules before and after anthesis. Additionally, GhDM2 showed higher expression levels in fiber at 15 and 25 DPA (Additional file 1: Fig. S2A, B). The 6mA methyltransferase encoding genes GhDAMT1-GhDAMT4 showed higher expression levels in 10 and 20 DPA ovules, besides, only two genes (GhALKBH3 and GhALKBH12) responsible for 6mA demethylation displayed higher expression level in the ovules and in fiber initiation stage and development stage (Additional file 1: Fig. S3A, B).
Moreover, the expression profiles of the above-listed potential genes were also analyzed in Xu142fl and Xu142 during the fiber initiation period. The results showed that GhDMT1 exhibited up-regulation while GhDMT4 and GhDMT7 exhibited down-regulation in Xu142 compared with Xu142f, respectively (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, GhDM9 displayed higher expression levels in all tested ovules and fibers of Xu142 than that of Xu142fl (Fig. 4B). Considering the 6mA methylation regulation, the GhDAMT4 showed higher transcript level although GhALKBH1, GhALKBH16 and GhALKBH17 displayed lower transcript levels during fibre initiation in Xu142 compared with Xu142fl (Fig. 5A, B). The aforementioned results indicate some potential causal factors associated with DNA methylation regulation and provide some clues for epigenetic modification mechanisms in fiber initiation.
To explore the conceivable interaction between histone acetylation and DNA methylation for fiber development, the in vitro TSA (Trichostatin A)—histone deacetylase inhibitor-treated ovules were used to test the alteration of DNA methylation level and transcription of DNA methylation related genes. The results suggested that TSA treatment decreased the global 5mC level weakly, while the 6mA level decreased significantly after 4 and 7 days in vitro (Additional file 1: Fig. S4). These results indicated the interplay between histone acetylation and DNA methylation during fiber development (Fig. 6). So, we also tested expression profiles of some DNA methyltransferases and demethylases after TSA treatment. The results showed that GhDMT1, GhDMT13, and GhDAMT3 were up-regulated, while GhDMT9, GhDMT11, and GhDAMT2 were down-regulated after TSA treatment. The DNA demethylase GhALKBH1 and GhALKBH12 were up-regulated, nevertheless, GhDM4, GhDM9, and GhALKBH14 were down-regulated after TSA treatment (Fig. 7), indicating that histone acetylation impacts DNA methylation through different genes and pathways.
Heritable DNA methylation is well documented and known to be crucial for diverse development stages in many organisms. Although, a large body of literature concerns the role and regulation of DNA methylation in eukaryotes including the correlation with gene expression, roles in various development regulations and stress tolerance (Hao et al. 2020; He et al. 2020; Liu and He 2020; Sun et al. 2021), but little is known about the functions and the underlying mechanisms in fiber development of cotton.
Until now, methylations at the fifth carbon of cytosine (5mC) and sixth nitrogen of adenine (6mA) dominate the DNA methylation in eukaryote cells. However, studies about 5mC and 6mA DNA methylation in cotton are scarce, and whether the 5mC and 6mA DNA methylation play roles in fiber development is yet ambiguous. In this study, a classic glabrous cotton cultivar Xu142fl and its counterpart line Xu142 were applied to investigate the profiles of 5mC and 6mA DNA methylation during fiber initiation and the potential function. Dot blot assays showed the abundant 5mC and 6mA methylation in the genomic DNA of the Xu142 and Xu142fl. Furthermore, both 5mC and 6mA DNA showed higher and lower levels in the 0 and 5 DPA ovules of Xu142 compared with Xu142fl, respectively, implying the potential and complex roles of DNA methylation in fiber initiation and primary elongation.
To reveal the possible causal factors resulting in the DNA methylation regulation in fiber development, the genome-wide identification of methyltransferase and demethylase encoding genes for 5mC and 6mA methylation were performed. Based on recent PacBio SMRT sequencing results of the G. hirsutum genome (Yang et al. 2019b), the genome assemblies of two important G. hirsutum lines TM-1 and ZM24 were used together in this study. Thirteen methyltransferase and ten demethylase encoding genes for 5mC were identified, which are not in agreement with the previous results (Sun et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2019a), the reason may be the difference between genome assemblies from Next-Generation sequencing and PacBio SMRT Sequencing technologies. Because PacBio SMRT Sequencing provides a long read, which can deal with the repetitive regions and areas with high GC content that can not be coverd and solved by Next-Generation Sequencing, as well as eliminate the amplification errors caused by PCR. In contrast, the Next-Generation sequencing provides a highly dispersed assembly with short reads, which leads to the different genome assemblies from Next-Generation sequencing and PacBio SMRT sequencing (Jayakumar and Sakakibara 2019; Midha et al. 2019; Ono et al. 2013). Moreover, 6 methyltransferase and 17 demethylase encoding genes for 6mA were identified. Almost all the associated genes were identified in these two genome assemblies accordingly except the GhALKBHs, two of which failed to be identified in TM-1 (Additional file 2: Table S1). A previous work demonstrated that a lot of genetic variations and some distinct structural variations located on chromosome A08 exist between TM-1 and ZM24, which may cause a different number of identified genes among them (Yang et al. 2019b). Furthermore, the expression profile analysis of the genes responsible for DNA methylation revealed that some genes showed special and high expression levels during ovule/fiber primary development and some tissues development (e.g., reproductive organs, ovules from −3 DPA to 20 DPA) such as GhDM2, GhDM7, GhDAMT1-GhDAMT4, and GhALKBH3/12; some genes displayed higher expression levels in Xu142 than in Xu142fl such as GhDMT1, GhDAMT4. Together, the expression analysis provided valuable information for the underlying function of genes in DNA methylation regulation to mediate fiber development.
The complex interactions between DNA methylation and other epigenetic modifications play an important role in diverse eukaryote development (Garbo et al. 2021; Gui and Yuan 2021; Jackson et al. 2002; Johnson et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2019b; Zhao et al. 2021). In plants, histone acetylation and DNA methylation regulate reciprocally in gene expression and development (Wan et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2015, 2019a). In this study, the interplay between histone acetylation and DNA methylation during fiber development was also analyzed. After the TSA-histone deacetylase inhibitor treatment, the DNA methylation level including 5mC and 6mA showed clear alteration during the fiber initiation with dot blot assay (Fig. 6), indicating that histone acetylation influences DNA methylation in fiber cell initiation; and some potential genes (e.g., GhDMT1/3/13, GhALKBH1/12/14, GhDAMT2/3) involved in the interaction between them were identified, however, the explicit relationship between histone acetylation and these genes associated with DNA methylation still need much more researches. Recent studies have applied gene-editing technology to modify the methylated cytosine to mediate plant development successfully (Liu et al. 2021), supporting the great potential of DNA methylation research in plant development and crop molecular breeding.
In this study, we detected the 5mC and 6mA DNA methylation pattern during the fiber initiation period of Xu142 and Xu142fl, and found a fluctuation of global DNA methylation level along with the fiber cell initiation and primary elongation. Then, the responsible genes for methylation regulation were identified in G. hirsutum. Among which, some genes showed higher expression levels in fiber initiation and significant difference of transcription between Xu142 and Xu142fl. The positive correlation between histone acetylation and DNA methylation in fiber initiation was also determined through in vitro approach, some causal genes (e. g., GhDMT13, GhDAMT2, GhALKBH12, GhDM7) were also suggested. These work provide potential key genes in DNA methylation and interesting clues about epigenetic modifications involved in fiber development.
The cultivar Xu142 and its natural isogenic glabrous mutant (Xu142fl) were planted in the experimental field in Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhengzhou research base, Henan). The flower buds and flowers in the full-bloom stage were labelled on consecutive days. The ovules of −2 DPA (day post-anthesis), 0 DPA, and 5 DPA, in which the ovules and fibers were separated and used, were collected from the labelled flowers with a sterile knife. The collected ovules/fibers were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further experiments.
Dot blot analysis of DNA 5mC and 6mA levels
The genomic DNA of each sample was extracted using the Vazyme kit (DC104) from the ovules cultured in BT medium with or without TSA in vitro. Purified genomic DNA was treated with RNase and denatured at 95 °C for 7 min, followed by chilling on ice directly. Then, the denatured DNA was spotted on a Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham RPN203B) optimized for nucleic acid transfer. After that, Hybond-N+ membrane harboring DNA was UV-crosslinked (UPV Crosslinker CX-2000) four times, blocked with 5% of non-fat milk in PBST, and incubated overnight with anti-6mA (1:500; Epigentek A-1014) and anti-5mC (1:2 000; Synaptic Systems 202 003) antibodies at 4 °C, respectively. After incubating with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (EpiZyme LF101/LF102), the membrane was visualized by ECL Western Blotting Detection Kit (EpiZyme SQ201).
Identification of cotton DNA demethylase and methyltransferase family members
Previously, DNA methyltransferase and demethylase for 5mC methylation were identified in G. hirsutum (Sun et al. 2018; Yang et al. 2019a), which were used as queries to generate targets in the updated genome assemblies (Yang et al. 2019b). It was found that the DNA methyltransferase genes CotAD_49037 and CotAD_14980 in JGI correspond to Gh_D01G2041001 in TM-1 in CRI and CotAD_00990, CotAD_00992 and CotAD_41398 correspond to Gh_D08G17330 in TM-1. The protein sequences of 6mA DNA methyltransferases in worms and demethylases in humans (Deniz et al. 2019; Greer et al. 2015) were used as queries to identify the homologous proteins for other plant species. The protein sequences of the candidate genes were analyzed by using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) to determine the conserved domain, then the amino acid sequences corresponding to the conserved domain were determined by PFAM (http://pfam.xfam.org/) and the genes containing the conserved domain were determined by the amino acid sequence from different species. The methyltransferase and demethylase protein sequences were confirmed by SMART (Letunic et al. 2015), Interproscan 63.0 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/InterProScan/) (Jones et al. 2014) and hidden Markov model (HMM) as described previously (Ali et al. 2019).
Prediction of the basic structure of DNA demethylase and methyltransferase gene families
The GFF (General Characteristic Format) files for the gene were obtained from the genome annotation file. The genes structure map was drawn by TB tools. Motif analysis was performed by the online tool MEME (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/). The physical map of the chromosome was established by the software TB tools.
Cotton DNA demethylase and DNA methyltransferase family evolution analysis
The amino acid sequence of G. hirsutum was used as a reference and the E <1× e−5 was used as a threshold to determine the homologous sequences amino acid sequence in Arabidopsis thaliana, Populus trichocarpa, Theobroma cacao, Vitis vinifera, and Oryza sativa. MEGA7.0 software was used to perform multiple sequence alignment (Clustal W) for DNA demethylase and methyltransferase sequences, and neighbor-joining (NJ) was used to establish trees. The 1 000 bootstrap replicates with 50% cutoff values were used and the tree was then visualized by Tree View 1.6 (http://etetoolkit.org/treeview/).
Cotton ovule culture
Flowers were harvested at −1 DPA, and ovaries were separated and surface sterilized by using 75% ethanol. Ovules were carefully dissected from the ovaries under sterile conditions and immediately floated on liquid media supplemented with optimized phytohormone concentrations (0.5 μmol·L−1 gibberellic acid and 5 μmol·L−1 indole acetic acid) and various concentrations of TSA in culture plates (Beasley and Ting 1974). The ovules were incubated at 32 °C in the dark without agitation. TSA (Millipore, 647925) was dissolved in 95% DMSO to make a 1 mmol· L−1 stock solution. Fiber development for all cultured ovules was analyzed after indication time of incubation by SEM (Hitachi SU3500). The cultured ovules were used for DNA extraction and dot blot assay as well as for RNA extraction for qRT-PCR.
Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted using the RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) from ovules of −2, 0, and 5 DPA and then quantified using a NanoDrop 8000 (Thermo Scientific™). Reverse transcription was performed using transScript® First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (Vazyme R233-01). cDNA was synthesized using 1 μg of total RNA in 20 μL reactions with HiScript® III All-in-one RT SuperMix according to manufacturer’s instruction (Vazyme R333-01). The qRT-PCR primers were obtained from the qPrimerDB database (http://biodb.swu.edu.cn/qprimerdb). UBQ7 was used as an internal control for the calculation of the relative transcript level of target genes. The primers used are listed in Additional file 3: Table S2. The PCRs were performed for each of the mRNA samples using the SYBR Green mix (AQ101-01, TransGen) and the universal conditions of amplification provided by the LightCycler 480 (Roche). The 2−∆∆Ct method was used to calculate the relative expression of each gene with three technical and biological repetitions.
Availability of data and material
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Ali F, Qanmber G, Li Y, et al. Genome-wide identification of Gossypium INDETERMINATE DOMAIN genes and their expression profiles in ovule development and abiotic stress responses. J Cotton Res. 2019;2:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-019-0021-6.
Beasley CA, Ting IP. Effects of plant growth substances on in vitro fiber development from unfertilized cotton ovules. Am J Bot. 1974;61:188–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1974.tb06045.x.
Deniz Ö, Frost J, Branco M. Regulation of transposable elements by DNA modifications. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:417–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-019-0106-6.
Du XM, Huang G, He SP, et al. Resequencing of 243 diploid cotton accessions based on an updated A genome identifies the genetic basis of key agronomic traits. Nat Genet. 2018;50:796–802. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0116-x.
Feng H, Li X, Chen H, et al. GhHUB2, a ubiquitin ligase, is involved in cotton fiber development via the ubiquitin-26S proteasome pathway. J Exp Bot. 2018;69:5059–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery269.
Fu Y, Luo GZ, Chen K, et al. N6-methyldeoxyadenosine marks active transcription start sites in Chlamydomonas. Cell. 2015;161:879–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.010.
Garbo S, Zwergel C, Battistelli C. m6A RNA methylation and beyond—the epigenetic machinery and potential treatment options. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26:2559–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2021.06.004.
Greer EL, Blanco MA, Gu L, et al. DNA methylation on N6-adenine in C. elegans. Cell. 2015;161:868–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.005.
Guan XY, Pang MX, Nah G, et al. miR828 and miR858 regulate homoeologous MYB2 gene functions in Arabidopsis trichome and cotton fibre development. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3050. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4050.
Gui YQ, Yuan SQ. Epigenetic regulations in mammalian spermatogenesis: RNA-m6A modification and beyond. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 2021;78:4893–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03823-9.
Hao M, Zhou Y, Zhou J, et al. Cold-induced ginsenosides accumulation is associated with the alteration in DNA methylation and relative gene expression in perennial American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) along with its plant growth and development process. J Ginseng Res. 2020;44:747–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2019.06.006.
He C, Zhang Z, Li B, et al. The pattern and function of DNA methylation in fungal plant pathogens. Microorganisms. 2020;8:227. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020227.
Hu HY, Wang MJ, Ding YH, et al. Transcriptomic repertoires depict the initiation of lint and fuzz fibres in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Biotechnol J. 2018;16:1002–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12844.
Jackson JP, Lindroth AM, Cao X, et al. Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature. 2002;416:556–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature731.
Jayakumar V, Sakakibara Y. Comprehensive evaluation of non-hybrid genome assembly tools for third-generation PacBio long-read sequence data. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20:866–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx147.
Jin X, Pang Y, Jia F, et al. A potential role for CHH DNA methylation in cotton fiber growth patterns. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e60547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060547.g001.
Johnson LM, Cao XF, Jacobsen SE. Interplay between two epigenetic marks: DNA methylation and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation. Curr Biol. 2002;12:1360–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00976-4.
Jones PA, Takai D. The role of DNA methylation in mammalian epigenetics. Science. 2001;293:1068–70. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1063852.
Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031.
Katada S, Imhof A, Sassone-Corsi P. Connecting threads: epigenetics and metabolism. Cell. 2012;148:24–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.001.
Kumar V, Singh B, Singh SK, et al. Role of GhHDA5 in H3K9 deacetylation and fiber initiation in Gossypium hirsutum. Plant J. 2018;95:1069–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14011.
Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART: recent updates, new developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D257–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku949.
Li F, Fan G, Wang K, et al. Genome sequence of the cultivated cotton Gossypium arboreum. Nat Genet. 2014;46:567–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2987].
Li FG, Fan GY, Lu CR, et al. Genome sequence of cultivated Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:524–30. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3208.
Liang Z, Shen L, Cui X, et al. DNA N6-adenine methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev Cell. 2018;45:406–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2018.03.012.
Liu J, He Z. Small DNA methylation, big player in plant abiotic stress responses and memory. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11: 595603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.595603.
Liu ZH, Tang S, Hu W, et al. Precise editing of methylated cytosine in Arabidopsis thaliana using a human APOBEC3Bctd-Cas9 fusion. Sci China Life Sci. 2021;65:219–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-021-1970-x.
Midha MK, Wu M, Chiu KP. Long-read sequencing in deciphering human genetics to a greater depth. Hum Genet. 2019;138:1201–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-019-02064-y.
Ono Y, Asai K, Hamada M. PBSIM: PacBio reads simulator—toward accurate genome assembly. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:119–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts649.
Orouji E, Peitsch WK, Orouji A, et al. Oncogenic role of an epigenetic reader of m6A RNA modification: YTHDF1 in merkel cell carcinoma. Cancers. 2020;12(1):202. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010202.
Qian W, Miki D, Zhang H, et al. A histone acetyltransferase regulates active DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis. Science. 2012;336:1445–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219416.
Qin YM, Zhu YX. How cotton fibers elongate: a tale of linear cell-growth mode. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14:106–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2010.09.010.
Singh PK, Gao W, Liao P, et al. Comparative acetylome analysis of wild-type and fuzzless-lintless mutant ovules of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum Cv. Xu142) unveils differential protein acetylation may regulate fiber development. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;150:56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.02.031.
Song Q, Guan X, Chen ZJ. Dynamic roles for small RNAs and DNA methylation during ovule and fiber development in allotetraploid cotton. PLoS Genet. 2015;11: e1005724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005724.
Sun ZW, Wang XF, Liu ZW, et al. Genome-wide association study discovered genetic variation and candidate genes of fibre quality traits in Gossypium hirsutum L. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15:982–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12693.
Sun Q, Qiao J, Zhang S, et al. Changes in DNA methylation assessed by genomic bisulfite sequencing suggest a role for DNA methylation in cotton fruiting branch development. Peer J. 2018;6: e4945. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4945.
Sun RZ, Liu J, Wang YY, et al. DNA methylation-mediated modulation of rapid desiccation tolerance acquisition and dehydration stress memory in the resurrection plant Boea hygrometrica. PLoS Genet. 2021;17: e1009549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009549.
Tamaru H, Selker EU. A histone H3 methyltransferase controls DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa. Nature. 2001;414:277–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/35104508.
Tamaru H, Zhang X, McMillen D, et al. Trimethylated lysine 9 of histone H3 is a mark for DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa. Nat Genet. 2003;34:75–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1143.
Wan Q, Guan XY, Yang NN, et al. Small interfering RNAs from bidirectional transcripts of GhMML3_A12 regulate cotton fiber development. New Phytol. 2016;210:1298–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13860.
Wang CL, Dong XM, Jin D, et al. Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein MBD7 is required for active DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015;167:905–14. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.252106.
Wang M, Wang P, Tu L, et al. Multi-omics maps of cotton fibre reveal epigenetic basis for staged single-cell differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:4067–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw238.
Wang LS, Wang CL, Liu XY, et al. Peroxisomal beta-oxidation regulates histone acetylation and DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019a;116:10576–85. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1904143116.
Wang Z, Yang Z, Li F. Updates on molecular mechanisms in the development of branched trichome in Arabidopsis and nonbranched in cotton. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019b;17:1706–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13167.
Wu TP, Wang T, Seetin MG, et al. DNA methylation on N6-adenine in mammalian embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2016;532:329–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17640.
Wu HT, Tian Y, Wan Q, et al. Genetics and evolution of MIXTA genes regulating cotton lint fiber development. New Phytol. 2018;217:883–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14844.
Xiao CL, Zhu S, He M, et al. N6-methyladenine DNA modification in the human genome. Mol Cell. 2018;71:306–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.015.
Yang X, Lu X, Chen X, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of DNA demethylase family in cotton. J Cotton Res. 2019a;2:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-019-0033-2.
Yang Z, Ge X, Yang Z, et al. Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations in upland cotton cultivars. Nat Commun. 2019b;10:2989. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10820-x.
Zhang G, Huang H, Liu D, et al. N6-methyladenine DNA modification in Drosophila. Cell. 2015;161:893–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.018.
Zhao YS, Xie SJ, Li XJ, et al. REPRESSOR OF SILENCING5 encodes a member of the small heat shock protein family and is required for DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26:2660–75. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.126730.
Zhao Y, Chen Y, Jin M, et al. The crosstalk between m6A RNA methylation and other epigenetic regulators: a novel perspective in epigenetic remodeling. Theranostics. 2021;11:4549–66. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.54967.
Zhou L, Tian S, Qin G. RNA methylomes reveal the m6A-mediated regulation of DNA demethylase gene SlDML2 in tomato fruit ripening. Genome Biol. 2019;20:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1771-7.
We thank Cheng Y and Li X (Zhengzhou Research Base, Institute of Cotton Research of CAAS) for technical assistance. We are grateful to Dr. Ali F for writing improvement of the manuscript.
This study was supported financially by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072022 and 31690093), the Creative Research Groups of China (31621005), and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (1610162020010202) for scientific research into non-profit industries.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
: Chromosomal Distribution of DNA 6mA methyltransferase (GhDAMT) and demethylase (GhALKBH) genes. (A-B) The distribution of the predicted DNA 6mA methyltransferase and demethylase genes in the genome of G. hirsutum (At and Dt sub-genome) was analyzed and displayed by TB tools. Fig. S2: Expression pattern of DNA 5mC methyltransferase (GhDMT) and demethylase (GhDM) genes in different tissues of G. hirsutum. (A, B) Heatmap of 13 GhDMT and ten GhDM genes in 23 different developmental tissues of G. hirsutum was generated by using the data obtained from NCBI. Fig. S3: Expression pattern of DNA 6mA methyltransferase (GhDAMT) and demethylase (GhALKBH) genes in different tissues of G. hirsutum. (A, B) Heatmap of six GhDAMT and 17 GhALKBH genes in 23 different developmental tissues of G. hirsutum was generated by using the data obtained from NCBI. Fig. S4: TSA represses the fiber initiation and development in vitro. Ovules of -1 DPA (days post anthesis) were treated with 10 µM TSA for 3 and 7 days in vitro, then the ovule surface was observed and captured by Scanning Electron Microscope. Bar = 1 mm (intact ovules) and Bar = 200 μm (magnification). The pictures on the right were the magnification of the indicated regions in the left pictures.
. Gene names and ID from the updated genome assembly with de novo technology.
. Primers used in this study.
About this article
Cite this article
CHEN, G., LI, Y., WEI, Z. et al. Dynamic profiles of DNA methylation and the interaction with histone acetylation during fiber cell initiation of Gossypium hirsutum. J Cotton Res 5, 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-022-00115-w