A nonsynonymous mutation in an acetolactate synthase gene (Gh_D10G1253) is required for tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides in cotton
Journal of Cotton Research volume 6, Article number: 4 (2023)
Herbicide tolerance in crops enables them to survive when lethal doses of herbicides are applied to surrounding weeds. Herbicide-tolerant crops can be developed through transgenic approaches or traditional mutagenesis approaches. At present, no transgenic herbicide tolerant cotton have been commercialized in China due to the genetically-modified organism (GMO) regulation law. We aim to develop a non-transgenic herbicide-tolerant cotton through ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis, offering an alternative choice for weed management.
Seeds of an elite cotton cultivar Lumianyan 37 (Lu37) were treated with EMS, and a mutant Lu37-1 showed strong tolerance to imidazolinone (IMI) herbicides was identified. A novel nonsynonymous substitution mutation Ser642Asn at acetolactate synthase (ALS) (Gh_D10G1253) in Lu37-1 mutant line was found to be the potential cause to the IMI herbicides tolerance in cotton. The Ser642Asn mutation in ALS did not present among the genomes of natural Gossypium species. Cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers were developed to identify the ALS mutant allele. The Arabidopsis overexpressing the mutanted ALS also showed high tolerance to IMI herbicides.
The nonsynonymous substitution mutation Ser642Asn of the ALS gene Gh_D10G1253 is a novel identified mutation in cotton. This substitution mutation has also been identified in the orthologous ALS genes in other crops. This mutant ALS allele can be used to develop IMI herbicide-tolerant crops via a non-transgenic or transgenic approach.
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is the most important source of widely used natural fiber. According to FAO statistics (https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL), China, India, the United States, Brazil, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey, and Australia are the top 8 cotton producing countries in the world. Weeds negatively affect cotton growth and yield by competing for nutrients, sunlight, space, and water. Poor weed management may lead to up to 90% yield reduction in cotton (Manalil et al. 2017). Herbicide-resistant cotton cultivars, mainly available with the genetically-modified glyphosate-resistant cotton, make weed management more convenient and efficient. However, overreliance on glyphosate has led to superweed problems (Heap and Duke 2018). The application of herbicides with different sites of action in weed control, in addition to glyphosate, will delay the evolution of resistance in weeds.
Acetolactate synthase (ALS), also known as acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS), is the first enzyme in the branched-chain amino acid (i.e., valine, leucine, and isoleucine) biosynthesis pathway that has been found in plants and microorganisms but not in animals. ALS is the target of 58 commercial herbicides from five herbicide chemical groups: imidazolinone (IMI), sulfonylurea (SU), triazolopyrimidine (TP), pyrimidinyl-thiobenzoates (PTB), and sulfonyl-aminocarbonyl-triazolinone (SCT). Those herbicides are used globally to protect stable crops, including corn, rice, wheat, cotton and more others, owing to their wide crop selectivity, low application rates, and low mammalian toxicity (Garcia et al. 2017). Point mutations in the target ALS gene improved plant tolerance to these ALS-inhibitor herbicides. As of 25 December 2022, 29 tolerance endowing-amino acid substitutions at 8 conserved positions of Arabidopsis thaliana ALS protein (AT3G48560: Ala122, Pro197, Ala205, Asp376, Arg377, Trp574, Ser653, and Gly654) have been identified in weeds (http://www.weedscience.org/Mutations/MutationDisplayAll.aspx). Some of these mutations, generated through cell culture, seed mutagenesis, microspore (pollen) mutagenesis, or natural selection, were used to develop ALS herbicide-tolerant crops commercialized as non-transgenic Clearfield® crops, including rice, wheat, maize, oilseed rape, and sunflower (Tan et al. 2005).
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) consists of 6 ALS genes. Two of them, on the A5 and A19 on the genomic clones, respectively are the most conserved genes (Grula et al. 1995). Cotton can also develop tolerance to ALS-inhibitor herbicides. Two cotton mutants continuously selected with TP insuspension cultures showed variable resistance to TP and cross-resistance to other ALS herbicides from IMI, SU, and PTB families (Subramanian et al. 1990). The embryogenic cell line with Trp563Ser mutation in the A19 gene and the Trp563Cys mutation in the A5 gene were screened with an SU herbicide, which conferred tolerance to both SU and IMI herbicides (Rajasekaran et al. 1996a). However, no fertile plants have been regenerated from these mutant cell lines. Subsequently, dual mutantion on both sites of Trp563Ser and Ser642Asn at A19 gene were introduced to cotton genome. Transgenic cotton Trp563Ser mutation plants exhibite tolerance to IMI and SU herbicides, while the Ser642Asn mutants are tolerant to IMI herbicides only (Rajasekaran et al. 1996b). Four cotton mutants tolerant to the IMI herbicide imazamox have been obtained through ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis of upland cotton seeds (Bechere et al. 2009, 2010). Genetic analysis revealed that the herbicide tolerant traits in the four mutant alleles are either from the same gene locus or the tightly linked gene loci. However, no resistance gene had been cloned. According to the current understanding of the mechanism of herbicide tolerance in cotton, we speculated that this resistance was attributed to a mutanted ALS gene that encoded an enzyme insensitive to the IMI herbicide imazamox. In addition to ALS genes, the P450 gene CYP749A16 (Gh_D10G1401) is also involved in acquiring the tolerance to the SU herbicide trifloxysulfuron sodium in cotton (Thyssen et al. 2014, 2018). And the mutation or silencing of CYP749A16 generated a sensitive phenotype to the SU herbicide in cotton.
In this study, we aim to develop non-transgenic herbicide-tolerant cotton and identify the corresponding gene underlying herbicide tolerance. We obtained a mutant cotton (Lu37-1) tolerant to IMI herbicides by EMS mutagenesis. A novel nonsynonymous substitution mutation (Ser642Asn) in an ALS gene (Gh_D10G1253) contributed to the tolerance to IMI herbicides in the mutant cotton Lu37-1. The ectopic expression of the mutanted cotton ALS gene in Arabidopsis also conferred the increased tolerance level to IMI herbicides.
Identification of an IMI-tolerant Lu37-1 cotton mutant
Approximately 50 kg of M2 cotton seeds were sown in field and then subjected to the imazapic at 6 × the recommended rate. At 40 days after planting, most of the plantlets showed symptoms of chlorosis, stunting, and leaf distortion, while the imazapic tolerant plants were taller and had fully expanded new leaves (Fig. 1a). A total of 9 putative tolerant M2 plantlets were obtained in the field, and 8 of them produced seeds after transplantation under greenhouse growth conditions. M3 seeds obtained from those 8 M2 plants were further screened by spraying with imazapic. At 15 days after treatment (DAT), the progeny of 7 M2 mutant lines were all susceptible to imazapic, showing stunted shoots and yellow-spotting leaves (Fig. 1b). Only one M2 mutant line produced 2 tolerant and 2 sensitive M3 plantlets. These two tolerant M3 plantlets grew normally (Fig. 1c) and were designated as Lu37-1 (i.e., Lu37-1–1 and Lu37-1–2) for further study.
Mutant Lu37-1 was tolerant to a high rate of imazapic
Higher dose of imazapic was applied to test the tolerance level of the Lu37-1 mutant in the field. At 40 DAT, the wild type plant was stunted, and the newly developed leaves were chlorotic and very small when treated with 3 × the recommended rate of imazapic (Fig. 1d). In contrast, the M4 generation of Lu37-1 developed normally with fully expanded and green leaves andexhibited resistance to imazapic of 3× and 6 × the recommended rate (Fig. 1e, f).
The M5 generation of Lu37-1 was further tested in the greenhouse growth condition. At 26 DAT, the shoot apical meristem of the wild type under the 3× and 6 × the recommended rate of imazapic was damaged and the growth was terminated (Fig. 2a). In contrast, only a minor inhibition of the development of Lu37-1 mutant was observed in the imazapic treatment of 3× and 6 × the recommended concentration comparing to the treatment with water (Fig. 2b, c).The degree of stunting and chlorosis phenotype was increased gradually with the increasing application rates of imazapic. However, newly formed leaves were still found in the two mutant lines under 21× and 24 × the recommended rate. At 64 DAT, the growth of the wild type treated with 3 × the recommended rate of imazapic was inhibited severely, showing chlorotic and distorted shoot tips, while the mutant plantlets under 21× and 24 × the recommended rate showed slightly crinkled and chlorotic leaves. And the mutants treated with imazapic at 12 × or less than 12× the recommended rate showed normal growth with regular plant height (Fig. 2d). This result suggested that the Lu37-1 mutant possessed at least eight fold elevated tolerance to imazapic than the wild type.
Mutant Lu37-1 was tolerant to other IMI herbicides but not to PTB or SU
Other ALS-inhibitor herbicides were used to test the cross-resistance in the Lu37-1 mutant. For imazethapyr and imazamox, chlorotic and stunted leaves were observed, and no new leaf was developed in the wild-type Lu37 at 26 DAT, while at least three new expanded leaves were developed in the mutant Lu37-1 (Fig. 3), indicating the increased tolerance level of Lu37-1 to these two IMI herbicides. There was no cross-resistance to the PTB herbicide bispyribac-sodium since both the wild type and the mutant had a similar sensitive phenotype. For the SU herbicides, both the wild-type Lu37 and mutant Lu37-1 showed similar tolerance responses to nicosulfuron and mesosulfuron-methyl, although slight chlorosis occurred in the leaves of the wild-type Lu37 treated with nicosulfuron. Thus, the mutant Lu37-1 gained tolerance to IMI herbicides but not to PTB and SU herbicides.
ALS enzyme of mutant Lu37-1 was insensitive to imazapic
We further tested whether the ALS enzyme was involved in the tolerance to the herbicide imazapic. Various concentrations of imazapic (0.01–100,000 μmol·L−1) were used to analyze the inhibition effect on ALS activity in vitro. The ALS enzyme from the wild-type Lu37 was sensitive to imazapic, and the enzyme activity decreased at 0.1 μmol·L−1 imazapic, and the enzyme activity only remained 35% at 10 μmol·L−1 imazapic (Fig. 4a). In contrast, the ALS from the mutant Lu37-1 remained normal activity at 100 μmol·L−1 imazapic and still had 43% activity at 10 000 μmol·L−1 imazapic. The IC50 of imazapic to the ALS enzyme in the mutant Lu37-1 was 7 633.026 μmol·L−1, increased by approximately 850 fold in comparison to the wild-type version of enzyme which had an IC50 of 8.983 μmol·L−1. These results indicated that the tolerance of Lu37-1 to imazapic was closely related to the insensitivity of the mutanted ALS to this herbicide.
Identification of the ALS mutation site in the Lu37-1 mutant
Because plant resistance to the ALS-inhibitor herbicides was mostly attributed to mutations in ALS genes (Yu and Powles 2014), we firstly tested whether the Lu37-1 mutant had mutations in the cotton ALS genes. Therefore, the sequences of two ALS genes (Gh_D10G1253 and Gh_A10G1238) amplified using the same primer pair could be easily clarified by their SNPs. Among the 20 sequencing clones, there are 4 clones from Lu37-1-1 and 4 clones from Lu37-1-2 containing the Gh_D10G1253 sequence, which all had a G-to-A transition at position 1925 in the CDS of Gh_D10G1253, resulting in the conversion of Ser642 to Asn642 in the amino acid sequence (Fig. 4b), while the other 12 clones contained Gh_A10G1238 sequence, which were 100% identical to the wild-type allele. Moreover, no wild-type sequence of Gh_D10G1253 was identified from these sequencing clones, indicating that the G-to-A mutation was homozygous in the Gh_D10G1253 gene of the Lu37-1 mutant (i.e., Lu37-1-1 and Lu37-1-2).
The genetic diversity among 1 913 cotton accessions, including 1 623 G. hirsutum, 261 G. barbadense, and 29 other Gossypium species, was recently investigated against the reference genome of G. hirsutum TM-1 HAU v1.0 (Li et al. 2021). We retrieved the SNPs at the genomic region of Gh_D10G1253 from this public database. Thirteen SNPs were found in the CDS of Gh_D10G1253, but no nucleotide diversity was found at Ser642 of Gh_D10G1253 (Fig. 4c), suggesting that the Ser642 was highly conserved during domestication and the Ser642Asn mutation of Gh_D10G1253 was a novel one.
CAPS marker for the ALS alleles
Sanger sequencing confirmed that the 416 bp polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products amplified by the primers GhD10ALS642-F1/Gh642M-R were the specific fragments amplified from the Gh_D10G1253 gene based on the characteristic SNPs(data not shown). Next, the SNP (G/A) between the wild-type and the mutant allele of Gh_D10G1253 was used to develop the CAPS marker for genotype detection. The 416 bp PCR product from the mutant contained the recognition sequence CAATTG for MfeI, which cut the sequence product into 2 fragment of 383 bp and 33 bp, while the PCR product from the wild type plant remain undigested since there was no digestion site in its sequences (Fig. 4d).
Transgenic Arabidopsis was tolerant to a high rate of imazapic
In order to further confirm the mutation at the Gh_D10G1253 was responsible for the increased tolerance to imazapic in cotton, the mutant allele of Gh_D10G1253 was transformed to Arabidopsis. The T1 and T2 generations of transgenic Arabidopsis were screened on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 50 mg·L−1 kanamycin to generate T3 seeds. The T3 plantlets as well as the wild-type Col were sown on the 1/2 MS supplemented with 0∼2 μmol·L−1 imazapic. At 21 DAT, the wild-type Col and some transgenic lines showed a chlorosis phenotype on 0.1 μmol·L−1 imazapic plate, while the resistant transgenic lines showed green leaves even on 2 μmol·L−1 imazapic plate (Fig. 5a), indicating at least 20-fold increased tolerance to continuous selection on imazapic plate. Based on the herbicide selection of T3, the resistant T4 lines were further confirmed on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 0.5 μmol·L−1 imazapic (Fig. 5a). The resistant T4 lines grown in pots were also sprayed with 2 mL imazapic at different concentrations to test their resistance levels. At 21 DAT, the wild-type Col and the transgenic Arabidopsis expressing the wild-type ALS (WT 8-2) developed a phenotype with purplish color and stunted shoot tips and eventually died at 1 µmol·L−1 imazapic (Fig. 5b). In contrast, the resistant transgenic S642N lines (S642N 4-14, 4-20) were tolerant to 8.7 µmol·L−1 imazapic, and some lines (i.e., S642N 4-20) were even tolerant to 44 µmol·L−1 imazapic, with at least 40-fold higher tolerance than the susceptible Arabidopsis lines.
The Lu37-1 cotton mutant tolerant to IMI herbicides offers an alternative choice for weed management
Herbicide resistance is an important and valuable trait in agricultural production since it offers an effective and economic approach to control weeds when used together withherbicides. As of 25 December 2022, there are 45 transgenic herbicide tolerance events commercially available in cotton globally, which integrate one, two, or three traits of herbicide tolerance to glufosinate, glyphosate, oxynil, 2,4-D, dicamba, sulfonylurea, or isoxaflutole, according to the GM Approval Database (https://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/commercialtrait/default.asp?TraitTypeID=1&TraitType=Herbicide%20Tolerance). However, none of these transgenic cotton events have been commercialized in China. Some transgenic cotton lines overexpressing the G2-aroA or pGR79 EPSPS-pGAT genes, which possess resistance to glyphosate, have been developed in China (Liang et al. 2017; Zhang et al. 2017). However, the commercialization of these transgenic events still have a long way to go in China since genetically-modified crops are under strict regulation and must undergo long approval processes with expensive registration cost. In contrast, herbicide-tolerant crops obtained by traditional mutation breeding methods are easier to be accepted by the public and governments. Here, we report the cotton mutant Lu37-1 from EMS mutagenesis that was highly tolerant to IMI-herbicides, offering a non-transgenic choice for weed management.
Cotton is sensitive to IMI herbicides. When planted in rotation with peanut, cotton plants have shown visibly injury (19%∼58% injury) by the imazapic residual from the previous application of 70 g a.i. ha−1 (manufacturer’s recommended rate) or 140 g a.i. ha−1 in the peanut field, which resulting in delayed cotton maturity and reduced yield (York et al. 2000). Here, the cotton mutant Lu37-1 possesses tolerance to 24 × the recommended rate of imazapic, or by eight fold elevated tolerance to imazapic when compared with the wild type whose growth has been completely inhibited at 3 × the recommended rate (Fig. 2). The high IMI-tolerant cotton Lu37-1 may protect the cotton plant from damage by IMI herbicides in crop rotation. Notably, 24 × the recommended rate of imazapic inhibited the growth of the Lu37-1 mutant plants, resulting in a dwarf phenotype when compared with plants treated with 12 × the recommended rate (Fig. 2). Therefore, the rate above 24 × the recommended rate of imazapic has not been tested in this study.
Molecular mechanism of Lu37-1 tolerance to IMI herbicides
The mechanisms of plant resistance to herbicides can be broadly classified into target-site resistance and nontarget-site resistance. Target-site resistance can occur when gene mutation confers an amino acid change in the target site of action of an herbicide, resulting in an insensitive or less sensitive target protein to the herbicide, or it can be conferred by the overexpression or amplification of the target gene of the herbicide (Powles and Yu 2010). Plant resistance to ALS-inhibitor herbicides is ofen associated with point mutations in the target ALS gene (Yu and Powles 2014), meanwhile, cytochrome P450 mediated metabolism may also occur in certain wheat cultivars (Rojano-Delgado et al. 2014). The ALS gene family of cotton (G. hirsutum) contains 6 ALS genes, and the A5 (herein Gh_A10G1238/Gohir.A10G138800 in CottonGen) and A19 (herein Gh_D10G1253/Gohir.D10G128000 in CottonGen) genes are the most conserved genes of ALS (Grula et al. 1995). Both the analysis of gene sequences and enzyme activity of ALS have confirmed that the herbicide tolerance of cotton mutant Lu37-1 is a target-site resistance attributed by a less sensitive mutanted ALS enzyme, which has a G-to-A mutation at the position which encode Ser642 of Gh_D10G1253. The G-to-A mutation was consistent with the finding that C/G to T/A transitions were the predominant mutations in EMS mutagenesis (Shirasawa et al. 2016). Moreover, the mutation in Ser642 of Gh_D10G1253 was not found in the natural 1 913 cotton accessions (Li et al. 2021). Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressed the mutant Gh_D10G1253 phenotype further confirm its tolerance to the IMI herbicide. Together, the Ser642Asn mutation in the cotton ALS gene Gh_D10G1253 confers tolerance to IMI herbicides.
The comparison of ALS proteins revealed that Ser642Asn in the cotton mutant Lu37-1 corresponded to the mutant Ser653Asn in Arabidopsis and Ser627Asn in rice, which has been widely used to develop commercialized IMI-tolerant maize, oilseed rape, wheat, and rice (Edi et al. 2013; Tan et al. 2005). In addition to Ser642Asn, Ser642Thr (in cotton ALS numbering) mutant of Arabidopsis and tobacco are also IMI-resistant, and Ser642Phe Arabidopsis mutant is resistant to both IMI and SU (Chong and Choi 2000; Lee et al. 1999). These results together suggest that Ser642 is a highly conserved and herbicide tolerance-endowing mutant site in ALS among plant species. Therefore, it is technically possible to develop IMI-tolerant traits in cotton and other crops, either using a native mutant form such as the EMS cotton mutant Lu37-1 in this study or in a transgenic approach (Rajasekaran et al. 1996b).
The cotton mutant Lu37-1 generated from EMS mutagenesis was strongly tolerant to IMI herbicides. The herbicide tolerance was attributed to the G-to-A transition at the position which encode Ser642 of the ALS gene Gh_D10G1253. The G-to-A (Ser642Asn) allele in Gh_D10G1253 has not been found in natural cotton species. A CAPS marker has been developed to genotype the herbicide-tolerant ALS allele. Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing the mutant Gh_D10G1253 confer high tolerance to IMI herbicides. The Gh_D10G1253 mutant ALS gene can be used to develop IMI herbicide-tolerant crops via a non-transgenic or transgenic approach.
Seed mutagenesis and selection of herbicide-tolerant cotton
According to the pre-experiment for the determination of the median lethal dose (LD50), delinted cotton seeds of cultivar Lumianyan 37 (Lu37) were imbibed in tap water for 8 h and then treated with 0.8% (w/v) of EMS (Sigma, USA; product number: M0880) for 14 h, followed by a treatment with 3.5% (w/v) of sodium thiosulfate (Sinopharm, Shanghai, China) for 30 min. The mutagenized seeds were rinsed in tap water 5 times for 5 min each time, and then planted in field. The plants arising from these seeds were M1 (mutant generation 1) plants, whose M2 seeds were harvested in bulk. M2 seeds were individually sown in field, immediately followed by a single pre-emergent application of the IMI herbicide PLATEAU® (BASF, Shanghai, China) at a rate of 518.4 g a.i. ha−1 (6 × the recommended rate in peanut field). The PLATEAU® contains the active ingredient imazapic at a concentration of 240 mg·mL−1, and the recommended application rate in peanut field is 86.4 g a.i. ha−1. Four to eight M3 seeds obtained from each tolerant M2 plant were sown in 32-well trays (54 × 28 × 6.3 cm) and then placed in the plant growth chamber. The M3 plantlets at the 2–3 leaf stage were sprayed with PLATEAU® 4 times within 15 days, i.e., 1 × the recommended rate on the 1st and 5th days and 3 × the recommended rate on the 10th and 15th days. One M2-tolerant mutant line and its progenies were designated as Lu37-1 for further study.
Herbicide tolerance level assay
To determine of the resistance levels of Lu37-1 to ALS-inhibitor herbicides, the M4 seeds of Lu37-1 as well as the wild-type Lu37 were sown in the field and sprayed with PLATEAU® at 3 and 6 × of the recommended rate at the 3–4 leaf stage. The M5 generation was screened in the greenhouse growth condition with imazapic and other ALS-inhibitor herbicides. Seeds of both Lu37-1 and Lu37 were sown in pots in greenhouse, and seedlings at the 1-leaf stage were treated with imazapic (IMI class), imazethapyr (IMI class), imazamox (IMI class), bispyribac-sodium (PTB class), nicosulfuron (SU class) and mesosulfuron-methyl (SU class), respectively. The greenhouse was maintained at 30 ± 3/25 ± 3 °C day/night temperature with natural sunlight. For imazapic treatment, the seedlings of mutant Lu37-1 were sprayed with different doses of PLATEAU®, including 3×, 6×, 9×, 12×, 18×, 21×, and 24 × the recommended rate, while the wild-type Lu37 seedlings were treated with 3× and 6 × the recommended rate. For treatments with imazethapyr, imazamox, bispyribac-sodium, nicosulfuron and mesosulfuron-methyl, the application rate at 3 × the recommended rate was tested in both mutant and wild type. The treatment with spraying water only served as a control at 0 × the recommended rate. The recommended rate was 97.5 g a.i. ha−1 for imazethapyr (Shandong Vicome Greenland Chemical Co., Ltd, Shandong, China), 45 g a.i. ha−1 for imazamox (Jiangsu Agrochem Laboratory Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China), 30 g a.i. ha−1 for bispyribac-sodium (Jiangsu Agrochem Laboratory Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China), 51 g a.i. ha−1 for nicosulfuron (Beijing Green Agricultural Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd, Beijing, China), and 13.5 g a.i. ha−1 for mesosulfuron-methyl (Jiangsu Agrochem Laboratory Co., Ltd, Nanjing, China) respectively.
ALS enzyme activity assay
A modified protocol according to Chen et al. (1996) and Singh et al. (1988) was used to test ALS enzyme activity in cotton. Cotton calli were induced from cotyledon explants in MS medium + 0.1 mg·L−1 2,4-D + 0.1 mg·L−1 KT + 30 g·L−1 glucose + 2.5 g·L−1 Phytagel for 40 d. For crude enzyme extraction, 1 g calli was harvested and ground in 1 mL extraction buffer (100 mmol·L−1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 5 mmol·L−1 MgCl2, 0.5 mmol·L−1 thiamine pyrophosphate (TPP), and 1 mmol·L−1 dithiothreitol) in a mortar. The homogenate was centrifuged at 25 000 × g for 20 min, and the clear supernatant was used directly for the assay. All samples were kept at 4 °C or on ice during this process. The assay mixture was prepared by adding the following solution to a final volume of 0.9 mL: 650 μL of reaction buffer (50 mmol·L−1 potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 1 mmol·L−1 MgCl2, and 1 mmol·L−1 TPP), 100 μL of imazapic dissolved in the reaction buffer with final concentrations of 0∼100 000 μmol·L−1, 100 μL of crude enzyme extraction, and 50 μL of 3.6 mol·L−1 pyruvate. For the blank control, pyruvate and imazapic were omitted from the assay mixture. All mixtures were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by mixing with 50 μL of 3 mol·L−1 H2SO4, and then incubated at 60 °C for 15 min. Then, 0.5 mL of 0.83 g·L−1 creatine and 0.5 mL of 8.3 g·L−1 1-naphthol were added to the mixture and incubated at 60 °C for 15 min and then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The absorption of the mixture was measured at 530 nm with a ScanDrop® 250 spectrophotometer (Analytik Jena, Germany). The relative ALS activities were presented as the percentage value of the absorption values in the presence of the herbicide imazapic to that of the treatment without herbicide. The IC50 (half maximal inhibitory concentration) of imazapic to the ALS enzyme was estimated in SPSS Statistics version 22 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) using the PROBIT procedure.
Identification of mutation sites in the ALS gene
The A19 gene (NCBI accession: Z46959.1) and A5 gene (NCBI accession: Z46960.1) were considered to be the most conserved ALS genes in cotton (Grula et al. 1995). The A19 and A5 genes were blasted against the reference genome of G. hirsutum L. acc. TM-1 in the CottonGen website (https://www.cottongen.org/blast), and gene ID were corresponded to the Gh_D10G1253/Gohir.D10G128000 and Gh_A10G1238/Gohir.A10G138800 in the TM-1, respectively. Both ALS genes only have one extron without intron. According to the conserved sequences between the two cotton ALS genes, the primers GhALS-F1 (5ʹ-CACCACAAGCCTCTCATCGAC-3ʹ) and GhALS-R1 (5'-CCATAACCCACCCTCATTC-3ʹ) were used to amplify the CDS of the two ALS genes. Cotton genome DNA was extracted from the leaves of the wild type Lu37 and the herbicide tolerant cotton plants (Lu37-1–1 and Lu37-1–2). The PCR solution contained 10 μL of 2 × Phanta Max buffer, 0.4 μL of dNTP mix (10 mmol·L−1 each), 0.2 μL of Phanta Max SuperFidelity DNA polymerase (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 0.2 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 1 μL of primers (10 μmol·L−1 of each), 1 μL of genomic DNA, and 6.2 μL of ddH2O. The PCR program was 95 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C C for 2 min; and then followed by 72 °C for 5 min and 16 °C for 1 min. The PCR products were TOPO-cloned into the pESI-Blunt vector (Yeasen, Shanghai, China) and then 10 independent PCR positive clones from each line were subjected to Sanger sequencing (Tsingke, Nangjing, China). The SnapGene software was used for DNA sequence alignment to identify the mutation site.
CAPS marker in ALS alleles
The forward primer GhD10ALS642-F1 (5'-TTGCAAACCCGGAGGCAGTT-3') specifically matched to Gh_D10G1253 was designed with SnapGene software. According to the web-based dCAPS Finder 2.0 (Neff et al. 2002), an additional C-to-A mismatch was designed in the primer GhD10ALS642M-R (5'-CTCTGTGATCACATCTTTGAAAGCGCCTCaA-3') to create a restriction site CaATTG for endonuclease MfeI to identify the mutant ALS sequence. The PCR solution contained 10 μL of 2 × Rapid Taq Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), 0.5 μL of primers (10 μmol·L−1 each), 1 μL of genomic DNA, and 8 μL of ddH2O. The PCR program was 95 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C C for 15 s; and then followed by 72 °C for 5 min and 16 °C for 1 min. The PCR product (416 bp) was first subjected to Sanger sequencing and then to endonuclease digestion with MfeI. For MfeI digestion, 1 μL of 10 × Cutsmart buffer, 4 μL of 416 bp PCR product, 1 μL of MfeI (NEB, Beijing, China), and 4 μL of ddH2O were well mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 3 h. The digestion products were run on 2% agarose gels at 100 V for 1 h.
Herbicide resistance assay in transgenic Arabidopsis
The coding sequences (CDS) of the wild type and the mutant Gh_D10G1253 ALS genes were amplified with the primers GhALS-F3 5'- CGGGGGACTCTAGAGGATCACACCACAAGCCTCTCATCGAC-3' and GhALS-R3 5'- GGGGAAATTCGAGCTCGGTACCCCATAACCCACCCTCATTC-3' using the corresponding TOPO clones, respectively. The PCR products were then cloned into the cassette under the control of the CaMV35S promoter in the binary vector pCAMBIA2301 by the ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China). Transgenic T1 and T2 Arabidopsis plants were screened by 50 mg·L−1 kanamycin supplied in 1/2 MS medium after transformation by the floral dip method (Clough and Bent 1998). The T3 and T4 generations of transgenic Arabidopsis as well as the wild-type Columbia (Col) were sown and screened on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 0∼2 μmol·L−1 imazapic. Herbicide-resistant T4 plantlets were further tested on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 0.5 μmol·L−1 imazapic and in pots by spraying with 2 mL of imazapic at different concentrations (0, 1, 4.3, 8.7, 21.8, 44, 109, and 218 μmol·L−1).
Availability of data and materials
Cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences
Bechere E, Auld DL, Dotray PA, et al. Imazamox tolerance in mutation-derived lines of upland cotton. Crop Sci. 2009;49(5):1586–92. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.09.0528.
Bechere E, Auld DL, Dotray PA, et al. Registration of four upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genetic stock mutants with tolerance to imazamox. J Plant Regist. 2010;4(2):155–8. https://doi.org/10.3198/jpr2009.08.0446crgs.
Chen YF, Li YW, Tang RS, et al. Simplified assay of acetolactate synthase activities (in Chinese with English abstract). Acta Agric Univresitatis Jiangxiensis. 1996;18(2):213–8.
Chong CK, Choi JD. Amino acid residues conferring herbicide tolerance in tobacco acetolactate synthase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;279(2):462–7. https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2000.3958.
Clough S, Bent A. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x.
Edi S, Song BK, Neik TX, et al. Clearfield® rice: Its development, success, and key challenges on a global perspective. Crop Protect. 2013;49:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.02.013.
Garcia MD, Nouwens A, Lonhienne TG, et al. Comprehensive understanding of acetohydroxyacid synthase inhibition by different herbicide families. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(7):E1091–100. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616142114.
Grula JW, Hudspeth RL, Hobbs SL, et al. Organization, inheritance and expression of acetohydroxyacid synthase genes in the cotton allotetraploid Gossypium hirsutum. Plant Mol Biol. 1995;28:837–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042069.
Heap I, Duke SO. Overview of glyphosate-resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Manag Sci. 2018;74(5):1040–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4760.
Lee YT, Chang AK, Duggleby RG. Effect of mutagenesis at serine 653 of Arabidopsis thaliana acetohydroxyacid synthase on the sensitivity to imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicides. FEBS Lett. 1999;452:341–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00668-7.
Li J, Yuan D, Wang P, et al. Cotton pan-genome retrieves the lost sequences and genes during domestication and selection. Genome Biol. 2021;22:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-021-02351-w.
Liang CZ, Sun B, Meng ZG, et al. Co-expression of GR79 EPSPS and GAT yields herbicide-resistant cotton with low glyphosate residues. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(12):1622–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12744.
Manalil S, Coast O, Werth J, et al. Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) through weed-crop competition: a review. Crop Protect. 2017;95:53–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.008.
Neff MM, Turk E, Kalishman M. Web-based primer design for single nucleotide polymorphism analysis. Trends Genet. 2002;18(12):613–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02820-2.
Powles SB, Yu Q. Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61(1):317–47. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112119.
Rajasekaran K, Grula JW, Anderson DM. Selection and characterization of mutant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cell lines resistant to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Plant Sci. 1996a;119(1–2):115–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(96)04444-5.
Rajasekaran K, Grula JW, Hudspeth RL, et al. Herbicide-resistant Acala and Coker cottons transformed with a native gene encoding mutant forms of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Mol Breed. 1996b;2(4):307–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00437909.
Rojano-Delgado AM, Priego-Capote F, Luque De Castro MD, et al. Mechanism of imazamox resistance of the Clearfield® wheat cultivar for better weed control. Agron Sustain Dev. 2014;35(2):639–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0232-7.
Shirasawa K, Hirakawa H, Nunome T, et al. Genome-wide survey of artificial mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate and gamma rays in tomato. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14(1):51–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12348.
Singh BK, Stidham MA, Shaner DL. Assay of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Anal Biochem. 1988;171(1):173–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(88)90139-X.
Subramanian MV, Hung H, Dias JM, et al. Properties of mutant acetolactate synthases resistant to triazolopyrimidine sulfonanilide. Plant Physiol. 1990;94(1):239–44. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.1.239.
Tan S, Evans RR, Dahmer ML, et al. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops : history, current status and future. Pest Manag Sci. 2005;61(3):246–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.993.
Thyssen GN, Mccarty JC, Li P, et al. Genetic mapping of non-target-site resistance to a sulfonylurea herbicide (Envoke®) in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Mol Breed. 2014;33(2):341–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-013-9953-6.
Thyssen GN, Naoumkina M, Mccarty JC, et al. The P450 gene CYP749A16 is required for tolerance to the sulfonylurea herbicide trifloxysulfuron sodium in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):186. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1414-2.
York AC, Jordan DL, Batts RB, Culpepper AS. Cotton response to imazapic and imazethapyr applied to a preceding peanut crop. J Cotton Sci. 2000;4(3):210–6.
Yu Q, Powles SB. Resistance to AHAS inhibitor herbicides: current understanding. Pest Manag Sci. 2014;70(9):1340–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3710.
Zhang XB, Tang QL, Wang XJ, et al. Development of glyphosate-tolerant transgenic cotton plants harboring the G2-aroA gene. J Integr Agric. 2017;16(3):551–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2095-3119(16)61458-2.
The authors would like to express sincere thanks to Dr. ZHANG Jun from Shandong Cotton Research Center, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China for providing the cotton seeds of cultivar Lumianyan 37 (Lu37).
This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China, grant number 2016YFD0101418, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32172047.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
CHEN, T., LING, X., YU, Y. et al. A nonsynonymous mutation in an acetolactate synthase gene (Gh_D10G1253) is required for tolerance to imidazolinone herbicides in cotton. J Cotton Res 6, 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-023-00141-2